IETF Logo Mail Archive

[hybi] Discontinuation of mux standardizaton in favor of WS/HTTP/2.0

Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> Tue, 07 January 2014 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <tyoshino@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D2C1AE477 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 23:36:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9cSI7ypCbs-T for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 23:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693101AE46C for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 23:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so16869249wes.1 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 23:36:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=QFu88o0Lrq2LKpJxkOiSlvO+q/YUglMLA0OK4/Wo36Y=; b=jHmyexQq+OpBkuddTeqZSV5/TZ5OiXAjQsy7+vCuMzo3o5nccq2DYuMWDqHADKPeYD ukx5ISuc/CoUtPASjnnNq0itaX6h+dEfxl1l4chKLfC+Q+GzcCM7jJzev4M7885kYHEd 2+KPr5oYeOmkSfODvdXsH/JQLS6ceQTCWonmCXnnHm/Rs+ILHicj9+ZqpYw5XJuKnHer xI4dbM2CHO1yDow+vby0oHip8Fv9oMBXRb8yvMIl3bGUd7CEagR8Yakh121P+DgxnkVZ 91VB4vmUr3mzJvaA5RTn7Y1rUMDd8rLZgE/KhQigjZ8gdBMIREuFYm6LIRMae6Dfb8eU 5Ctg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=QFu88o0Lrq2LKpJxkOiSlvO+q/YUglMLA0OK4/Wo36Y=; b=Mq6F9eNLCW9XkEXycUM8tO5XiQJlyXU9S3k080cNytSMPcaXqRwxgJPOl84nryZ0lG Yk6L+aYrDa5D6sfmhvRPRSSuIE/WaKL7TUfmDGdWZ3NNMmzTCZo0o649jVHFyiS5uioA jRCgMWyyzmgapbo3sXwV8Ilxos/Q6pw8odbfEjGlpk9/zmG6MJxC56xRCswktLllSnvf rZ8Ov0qcLadFiF8EyrKmlhGqzLEzux+yb3+PMcOXHOtFvnrf5hx2p3kuRNFDJE92w1wV 4TqC/pqsZluGb3vxNNiTOmQtFSnVpaDrm02hAspeFcsI1ivmSDfZ8DVoO1kRUDuFedW9 jpdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmi09ZLU8gbjd1PLlv73jbPN1he+tzhHTSXNm7ElDnquqopPmMvsIdCEAFHNSf36bV6/0nRdJ230q+koO8/YZmLQLXHQnT28NbcfZW+e9RhGeclsYcGF4YllFPq7r/eWbDdlgg92RZqT4yk7f5CQUtIsxxmGEHnHenDlLcNW381lMxnqYFmCWJ2uxzMuFobEddGWIq9
X-Received: by 10.194.78.179 with SMTP id c19mr3674021wjx.84.1389080197072; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 23:36:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.8.231 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 23:36:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:36:17 +0900
Message-ID: <CAH9hSJah=4Z4-NufVrUrP965epc9eMdEbC+3LmucN4DhR=bWiQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bfcf6a2b6134204ef5c6f0e"
Subject: [hybi] Discontinuation of mux standardizaton in favor of WS/HTTP/2.0
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:36:48 -0000

Hi all,

We've been working on mux extension to make WebSocket scalable for long
time, but as SPDY got widely supported and adopted quickly, now there seems
to be no longer any good reason to continue this work which is WebSocket
dedicated.

Scalability is still important issue to address. From now, I'd like to
focus on WS/SPDY effort which we've been working on in parallel with the
mux extension.

Please take a look at the latest proposal in this post.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/spdy-dev/aJut2ax3glc

If you really want the dedicated mux extension than one over SPDY, sorry
but please take over the work.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email