Re: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response moving to next step

I note that section 3 of RFC 7282 states:

"The chair of a working group who is about to find that there is only rough
consensus is going to have to decide that not only has the working group
taken the objection seriously, but that it has fully examined the
ramifications of not making a change to accommodate it, and that the outcome
does not constitute a failure to meet the technical requirements of the
work. ... A valid justification needs to me [sic] made."

Therefore, I would request that the co-chairs provide a justification for
the conclusion that rough consensus has been achieved.

Thanks and best,
Richard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ianaplan [mailto:ianaplan-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Marc
> Blanchet
> Sent: mercredi, 26. novembre 2014 19:20
> To: ianaplan@ietf.org
> Cc: Jari Arrko
> Subject: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response moving to next step
>
>
> Based on the working group last call comments and meeting, the
> co-chairs have come to conclusion that the working group have
> achieved rough concensus on the latest version of
> draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response  (i.e. -07).  The shepherd is
> entering his writeup. So the co-chairs have asked the AD to move
> the document to the next step.
>
> Regards, Marc&Leslie, co-chairs.
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>