[Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question from the ICG
"Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Thu, 19 February 2015 16:03 UTC
Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1608B1A9136 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:03:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GDmCoyXrUzRL for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:03:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zoidberg.ecotroph.net (zeke.ecotroph.net [70.164.19.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB0101A90E5 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:03:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aran.int.lexiconix.com (pool-108-44-246-138.clppva.fios.verizon.net [108.44.246.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zoidberg.ecotroph.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE07CA05A1; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:03:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <54E60949.6050706@thinkingcat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:03:21 -0500
From: "Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
References: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/lB3Q0TfvQTxBNLN4ZVDxaXPkEXE>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Subject: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:03:31 -0000
Thanks, everyone, for your responses and input. I have heard some concerns from Jefsey about the scope of "IETF Trust" versus the Internet community, and one person observed, out of band, that the last bullet reads properly if it says "on behalf" instead of "in behalf". Other than that, there is support for these points. So, Marc & I are declaring that the WG has consensus on the points: With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain, both are associated with the IANA Numbering Services and not with a particular IANA Numbering Services Operator. The IETF considers the IETF Trust to be an acceptable candidate for holding the trademark and domain. The IETF would support a decision by the IETF Trust to hold the IANA mark, and iana.org domain on behalf of the Internet community. Thanks, Leslie. On 2/16/15 11:03 AM, Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat) wrote: > > All, > > There seems to be general agreement that there is not an incompatibility > between the RIR proposal requirement and the IETF's proposal. > > We would like to determine if there is consensus on the following > points, as expressed by Dave Crocker (thanks!) on February 9, 2015: > > With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain, both > are associated with the IANA Numbering Services and not with a > particular IANA Numbering Services Operator. > > The IETF considers the IETF Trust to be an acceptable candidate for > holding the trademark and domain. > > The IETF would support a decision by the IETF Trust to hold the > IANA mark, and iana.org domain in behalf of the Internet community. > > > > If there are objections to these points, please let us know by 00h00 UTC > on February 19, 2015. > > Leslie/Marc. > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Leslie Daigle Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises ldaigle@thinkingcat.com -------------------------------------------------------------------
- [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Brian Trammell
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG John Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG John C Klensin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG Jari Arkko
- [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question from… Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question … Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question … Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question … Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question … John Curran