IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ianaplan] Time frame inquiry

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 27 May 2015 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFDA1A1DBD for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 09:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tSus6Hhjs4Kp for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 09:16:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 128591A1BCC for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 09:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720C420B9A for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 12:16:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 27 May 2015 12:16:55 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=R9Qp/kbxahqeZWQLsXZK1Qb3af4 =; b=ZO9sV0owRHRbTCbeennvy5XOXlq3iLi+mmXpbYjadrCRLUrExYViH/g7Sno HFFLHk/EJM02mCm5bfmmf5lQTBwVQLS6WqhWKaepkgC2fMH8o08gpbwGMAI0fDfy KU4l4z+DQ5QTwFJxnvpjE78kjPzPl0sfbf3a4NSZEVXpVrqI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=R9 Qp/kbxahqeZWQLsXZK1Qb3af4=; b=UiQCOaKlqs2kmYdr+qujP9OLEcuJMQQ7Dt 2/oKqdi9leDVw5NbwuVdSpSjBO8Umk9CGxX2xfSvATDlsI2kpUVMZ8MYofOa2v+W J45SfhBmEjXmyHj/ldomkdcCNfKw0lsuNp1vLxYpUilxj+V7Iu5ZT56IaG5b+1u/ mKiVzeBiM=
X-Sasl-enc: tWXz1HoflwNRiC/oa7LCEOaH/zdpJUud1C+o3LTZnEco 1432743415
Received: from [192.168.1.203] (unknown [24.6.61.198]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0AC8DC00019; Wed, 27 May 2015 12:16:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7CCDE81B-659B-43E5-BEB6-AD16A4562076"
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 09:17:50 -0700
Message-Id: <D15A3C14-F268-4CF1-B942-BAE57B281C58@cooperw.in>
To: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/vJBHrFIBSB0EOeVw1k5pwv7Bqjs>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, "Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, Mohamed El Bashir <mbashir@mbash.net>, Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
Subject: [Ianaplan] Time frame inquiry
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 16:17:06 -0000

Dear IANAPLAN WG,

The ICG chairs recently received a letter from Larry Strickling <http://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/correspondence/Letter-to-ICG-May-6.pdf> that included the following text:

"Accordingly, to assist us in our planning for the fall, I ask that the community provide us with an update on the status of the transition planning and the associated timeframes, including the community’s views as to how long it will take to finalize the transition plan and implement it after it is approved. We request that you and the three primary customer working groups provide us with your views before the end of June, which will give you the opportunity to discuss these issues with the multistakeholder community at the June ICANN meeting in Argentina. In providing this feedback, please keep in mind that the United States Government will need sufficient time to evaluate the proposal and that all work items identified either by the ICG and the CCWG-Accountability as prerequisites for the transition will need to be implemented prior to the ending of the contract.”

The ICG is therefore gathering input about how much time the operational communities believe they will need to complete proposal development and implement the aspects of the transition proposal that the communities have identified as needing to be completed prior to the expiry of the NTIA contract (e.g., creation of new contracts, agreements, or entities). From start to finish, approximately how many weeks or months do you think your community will need to complete the implementation of these aspects? We asked about this in our RFP but would appreciate an up-to-date estimate. We understand that this may be difficult to predict; we would appreciate your best estimate and an explanation of factors contributing to that estimate.

If you could provide us an initial response via your ICG representatives (Jari Arkko and Alissa Cooper) by June 9 at 23:59 UTC, that would be much appreciated. If you have further thoughts to communicate to us later in June, that would be welcome.

Thanks,
Alissa, Patrik, and Mohamed

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email