[Icar] reviewer pools

[Mark Allman <mallman at icir.org>]

I want to see if we can get some discussion going on how to design pool
of reviewers for ICAR-type experiments.  Some specific questions that
jump to mind:

  + What should the granularity of the reviewer pool be?  Should we have
    one big pool for the IETF (ala SIRS)?  Or, should their be an area
    review team?  Or, a WG review team?  Or, a review team specific to
    each i-d?  (That seems to be the space.  Or, what else could their
    be?)  Is there any value in having more than one granularity of team
    and having handoffs or overlap in some fashion?

  + Who should be eligible for these review teams?  E.g., the kind of
    concrete track record of IETF work outlined in SIRS?  E.g., teams
    populated by AD "nominations"?  E.g., teams populated by WG chair
    "nominations"?  E.g., purely voluntary teams with no hard
    requirements on who can volunteer?

If folks could give their opinions on the above questions (and, anything
else in this space, naturally), that'd be wonderful!

Thanks,
allman

Attachment: pgpR5KEYMCKAs.pgp
Description: PGP signature