Re: [Icar] icar-experiment-early-review-00 comments

[Melinda Shore <mshore at cisco.com>]

On Wednesday, August 11, 2004, at 12:00 PM, Mark Allman wrote:
> If the shiny -00 is a WG document or a WG is thinking about it then a 
> WG
> chair / secratary can handle it.

For early review I think I'd prefer that the wg chair or
secretary handle it, as well.  If the AD thinks there's an
issue, he or she can let the wg chair know that there's a need
for a review.

> If it is to be submitted to IESG independent of a WG then an AD can
> handle it.

I agree.  What I really don't want to see is the reviewer pool, which I
think needs to be regarded as a scarce and precious resource,
being used to review drafts at the request of an author.  That can be
handled through the usual mechanisms (posting a "hey, look at this" 
message
to the appropriate mailing list, contacting interested people out-of-
band, etc.).

Melinda


_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar