Re: [Icar] icar-experiment-early-review-00 comments
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Icar] icar-experiment-early-review-00 comments
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Melinda Shore wrote:
> I agree. What I really don't want to see is the reviewer pool,
> which I think needs to be regarded as a scarce and precious
> resource, being used to review drafts at the request of an author.
> That can be handled through the usual mechanisms (posting a "hey,
> look at this" message to the appropriate mailing list, contacting
> interested people out-of- band, etc.).
This was precisely my point -- I think the doc or the process needs to
have a good understanding how it will handle the authors who request
reviews of their half-baked ideas (when they shouldn't).
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.