Re: [Icar] icar-experiment-early-review-00 comments

[Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net>]

Harald,

HTA> So we get a statement saying:
HTA> - A WG chair can request review for a document he/she finds relevant to the
HTA> WG
HTA> - An AD can request review of any document
HTA> - Neither one is obliged to request a review. It's their call to do so.


Yes, this sounds reasonable.

Here's why it isn't:

Reviews are part of the document development process. It is not an AD's
job to do the work of document development. That is the job of a working
group or an independent submitter.

An AD needs to facilitate the process of getting work done, but that is
different than getting it done themselves.  An example of facilitating
would be to make sure that the responsible person understands what will
help the process and how to get it done.

Before assigning a task to an AD, ask whether it is essential, or
whether the task can reasonably be done elsewhere.

d/
--
 Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>


_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar