[Icar] pool entry; take N

[Mark Allman <mallman at icir.org>]

With my WG co-chair hat on (and, after having consulted with the holder
of the other such hat) ....

Based on the discussion on the list and the discussion at the San Diego
IETF meeting I'd like to propose that we have rough consensus that
subjective entry into the ICAR reviewer pool be based on AD sponsorship.
And, further, we encourage folks to review a variety of documents that
ICAR has been requested to review and present those to the ADs at the
time of requesting sponsorship (but, that there is no magic N that is
required and that sponsorship is not tied to only these reviews).

I understand that some folks don't agree with this approach.  However,
it seems that we do have agreement to have *some* subjective criteria.
And, further, we need to get this experiment going.  I think we have
rough consensus that the above is a reasonable first approach (that can,
as with everything else, be tuned during the experiment).

If you feel this is unreasonable please yell soon (especially if you
have not voice an opinion on this issue in the past).  We'd like to
start some reviewing shortly.

Thanks!

allman


--
Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/

Attachment: pgpeF066LuxMh.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar