![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 01:21:54PM -0400, Mark Allman allegedly wrote: > This doesn't look like a lovely picture to me. This really smells > like ICAR is something the community does not want. Or, at least does > not want to put their energy into, in practice. Joel and I would > appreciate any thoughts on moving forward (and, saying "ok, it didn't > work" **is** a path forward). I still think it's the right idea, I think people are just busy. Let's poll the wg-chairs and see where they stand. We don't need the IESG, we can find an initial set of WGs ourselves, eh? swb
Attachment:
pgpyHxgFEvYHR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Icar mailing list Icar at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar