Re: [Icar] icar futures?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Icar] icar futures?



On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 01:21:54PM -0400, Mark Allman allegedly wrote:
> This doesn't look like a lovely picture to me.  This really smells
> like ICAR is something the community does not want.  Or, at least does
> not want to put their energy into, in practice.  Joel and I would
> appreciate any thoughts on moving forward (and, saying "ok, it didn't
> work" **is** a path forward).

I still think it's the right idea, I think people are just busy.  Let's
poll the wg-chairs and see where they stand.  We don't need the IESG, we
can find an initial set of WGs ourselves, eh?

swb

Attachment: pgpyHxgFEvYHR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.