Re: [Icar] icar futures?

[Pekka Savola <pekkas at netcore.fi>]

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Mark Allman wrote:
>   * "we don't need the IESG"
> 
>     I agree that we do not need this bit of help from the IESG to get
>     things started.  I think the broader issue here is that the IESG is
>     not enthusiastic about ICAR early review.  Is it reasonable to hope
>     to see this sort of thing widely used without some support from the
>     IESG?  (Maybe it is... but, I'd like to hear someone argue the
>     point.)

The IESG is crucial for this to work.  I'd suggest you ping IESG, 
through Harald if necessary about this.

One could ask that each AD tries to list 3-4 persons capable of ICAR
reviews they know of, and either the AD or you approach these persons 
1-on-1, soliciting help.

Remember, the fundamental problem is that broadcast don't work... 
you'll have to approach the people the right way ("you were 
recommended as a good reviewer, and we need YOUR help...")..

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings


_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar