[Icar] Thoughts on ICAR direction

[Margaret Wasserman <margaret at thingmagic.com>]

Hi All,

(Writing just as an interested participant...)

I've been watching the evolution of ICAR, and it seems like we aren't 
succeeding in building a centralized structure for early review.  I 
think that there are a number of reasons for this, the most pertinent 
of which (IMO) is that a WG is not the right vehicle to develop and 
manage a program.

So, I have some ideas for directions that ICAR could take that don't 
involve building a centralized review infrastructure, so they might 
be more suitable to

(1) Document cross-area review criteria.  This would help to educate 
authors and ad hoc early reviewers in what to look for.

(2) Develop a process for WG chairs to use existing area review 
resources (MIB Doctors, GEN-ART, Security directorate, Ops 
directorate, etc.) to get early review for their documents?  Maybe 
this could be a proposed "July 14" experiment?

Thoughts?

Margaret



_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar