Re: [Icar] A modest proposal for moving forward with ICAR

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>]

one further suggestion.....

why wait for permission, or to be asked? Why not perform the wg-00 reviews, 
archive them, and build experience that way?

If we can build on a body of experience that says "these wg-00 reviews were 
done, these wg-00 reviews were helpful", I think persuading WG chairs and 
ADs - AND potential reviewers - that this is a beneficial procedure to be 
followed will be easier.

Vigilante Reviewers Of Oncoming Material, anyone?
(VROOM!)

--On 12. november 2004 09:06 -0500 Spencer Dawkins <spencer at mcsr-labs.org> 
wrote:

> Howzabout we
>
> - identify an AD who is willing to commit one or more working groups
>   as experiment fodder,
> - assign ICAR reviewers to any individual drafts that are adopted
>   as WG items
> - review for document structure and completeness THEN, so
>   draft-ietf-WG-mumble-00.txt is always our best effort, and
> - report the reviews and experiences with this experiment in
>   Minneapolis?
>
> This has the advantage of doing something now with the resources that
> we have now ("contents may settle due to shipping").





_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar