Tools? (Re: [Icar] Thoughts on ICAR direction)

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>]

--On søndag, november 14, 2004 10:27:56 -0700 Alex Rousskov 
<rousskov at measurement-factory.com> wrote:

> > These are both good suggestions. I wonder if the charter of the
> > TOOLs effort can be twisted a bit to host this work. It's
> > interesting that we've had two damp squibs (SIRs and now apparently
> > ICAR) but MIB doctoring, GEN-ART etc seem to be working nicely.
>
> I agree that the Tools team can document interfaces and/or suggest tools
> to support review processes (e.g., solicitation, archival, and linking of
> reviews). However, it looks like Mark is doing a "good enough" job
> already, and we would need more data/experience to design something more
> permanent.

Just checking.....

Mark - do you feel that your "prototype" infrastructure can support a 
serious "freewheeling" review effort, or would you have to invest more 
effort in it before it's "routinely usable"?

                      Harald

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar