Re: Tools? (Re: [Icar] Thoughts on ICAR direction)

To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: Tools? (Re: [Icar] Thoughts on ICAR direction)
From: Mark Allman <mallman at icir.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:10:09 -0500
Cc: icar at ietf.org, Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>, Alex Rousskov <rousskov at measurement-factory.com>
In-reply-to: <90A0817794F914F2E2716B6B@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
List-help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR)
Reply-to: mallman at icir.org
Sender: icar-bounces at ietf.org
Song-of-the-day: Sweet Emotion

> Mark - do you feel that your "prototype" infrastructure can support a
> serious "freewheeling" review effort, or would you have to invest more
> effort in it before it's "routinely usable"?

Let's use what I have.

If past indications are anything to go by, "freewheeling review effort"
won't be so tough on the tool.

(More of my thoughts later in the day.)

allman

Attachment: pgpqHZP9sXvu8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

References:
- Tools? (Re: [Icar] Thoughts on ICAR direction)
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Prev by Date: Tools? (Re: [Icar] Thoughts on ICAR direction)
Next by Date: Re: [Icar] A modest proposal for moving forward with ICAR
Previous by thread: Tools? (Re: [Icar] Thoughts on ICAR direction)
Next by thread: Re: [Icar] Thoughts on ICAR direction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: Tools? (Re: [Icar] Thoughts on ICAR direction)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.