Re: [Icar] icar futures?

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

My guess is that to corporate suits, "directorate" sounds
like a control point and "review" sounds passive. If we can
find a way of making "review" sound as important as we believe
it to be, that will help.

     Brian

Mark Allman wrote:
> > My sponsoring organization really liked the marketing aspects of
> > supporting "Senior Internet Reviewers". I can explain to my sponsoring
> > organization why I participate in directorates, and I can explain why
> > I participate in an Area Review Team. Given a finite number of hours
> > in the day...
>
>
> I want to drill on this.  I don't get it at all.
>
> I can see the obvious appeal of "senior...".  But, the rest of the above
> you say you can "explain" (e.g., you can explain participation in a
> directorate (that does not have a sexy name)).  So, if you can explain
> and justify directorate work then why can't you explain ICAR work?  I am
> trying to figure out if there is something fundamental here that is
> causing problems.
>
> Thanks!
>
> allman
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Icar mailing list
> Icar at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar