Re: [Icar] icar futures?

To: "Brian E Carpenter" <brc at zurich.ibm.com>, mallman at icir.org
Subject: Re: [Icar] icar futures?
From: "Alex Rousskov" <rousskov at measurement-factory.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:19:00 -0700
Cc: icar at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <419A214C.5040509@zurich.ibm.com>
List-help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: The Measurement Factory
References: <20041116142954.5409577AA12@guns.icir.org> <419A214C.5040509@zurich.ibm.com>
Sender: icar-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Opera M2/7.54 (FreeBSD, build 751)

On Tue, 2004/11/16 (MST), <brc at zurich.ibm.com> wrote:

My guess is that to corporate suits, "directorate" sounds
like a control point and "review" sounds passive. If we can
find a way of making "review" sound as important as we believe
it to be, that will help.


How about a name with a "gatekeeper" in it? IETF Gatekeepers?
Sexy, important enough? There does not have to be much truth in the name,
I guess. It is all marketing.

Alex.

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

Follow-Ups:
- [Icar] Why I haven't signed up for ICAR
  - From: Spencer Dawkins

References:
- Re: [Icar] icar futures?
  - From: Mark Allman
- Re: [Icar] icar futures?
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: [Icar] icar futures?
Next by Date: [Icar] Why I haven't signed up for ICAR
Previous by thread: Re: [Icar] icar futures?
Next by thread: [Icar] Why I haven't signed up for ICAR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Icar] icar futures?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.