RE: [Idr] draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR WG document

["Susan Hares" <shares at nexthop.com>]

Enrico:

 

Thank you for your comments. 

Yakov and I appreciate the input.

 

Could you let me know if you are:

a) vendor  b) network operator or

c) valued researcher/expert

or d) other?

 

Sue

-----Original Message-----
From: Enrico Salazar [mailto:bgp31415@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:49 PM
To: Yakov Rekhter; idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR WG document

I object to taking signalled prefix limit, as I think that the existing mechanisms are sufficient to handle real-life scenarios (see
Pekka's e-mail).

 

If there is an agreement that there are real-life scenarios that
require signalled prefix limit, then I would be in favor of accepting
draft-keyur-prefixlimit-orf-00.txt.

 

I object accepting draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt.

 

   Enrico


Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net> wrote:

Folks,

Given the current discussion on the mailing list, the deadline
for comments on accepting draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt
as an IDR WG document is extended to May 24, 2004.

This way May 24 is the deadline for comments on the following:

1. whether to take signalled prefix limit as a WG item

2. whether to accept draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR
WG document

3. whether to accept draft-keyur-prefixlimit-orf-00.txt as an IDR
WG document

In your e-mails please clearly indicate your preferences. Providing
rationale for your preferences would be extremely useful as well.

Yakov.

P.S If folks feel that the deadline should be extended beyond
May 24, please say so.

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

---

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'