[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Idr] draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR WG document

To: Tony Li <tony.li at tony.li>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR WG document
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov at juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 11:22:40 -0700
Cc: idr at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 14 May 2004 15:15:37 PDT." <3A320A8C-A5F4-11D8-A4BD-000A95D1475E@tony.li>
List-archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/idr/>
List-help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>,<mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>,<mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: idr-admin at ietf.org

Tony,

Could you please clarify whether (a) you are in favor or against
accepting signalled prefix limit as an IDR WG item, and if yes,
then (b) which of the two approaches (draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt
or draft-keyur-prefixlimit-orf-00.txt) would you favor.

Yakov.

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Idr] draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR WG document
  - From: Vivek Menezes
- Re: [Idr] draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR WG document
  - From: Tony Li

References:
- Re: [Idr] draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR WG document
  - From: Tony Li

Prev by Date: RE: [Idr] proposed additional text
Next by Date: Re: [Idr] draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR WG document
Previous by thread: Re: [Idr] draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR WG document
Next by thread: Re: [Idr] draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR WG document
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread