[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Idr] draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR WG document

Eric:

Thanks for clarifying that point.

Sue

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Rosen [mailto:erosen@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 3:45 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: Fang, Luyuan, ALABS; Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS; Yakov Rekhter;
idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-chavali-bgp-prefixlimit-02.txt as an IDR WG
document 



> Could you be specific on what other thresholds? 

In draft-chavali terminology, I think  Luyuan's argument supports the use of
the "maximum prefix limit" but not  the "reset prefix limit" or the "warning
prefix limit". 

Since the  "maximum prefix limit" is  essentially the same (I  think) as the
"prefix limit" of draft-keyur, I don't think that Luyuan's argument provides
a basis for preferring draft-chavali. 


_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr