Re: [Idr] Progressing draft-bhatia-bgp-multiple-next-hops-01.txt

[Pedro Roque Marques <roque at juniper.net>]

John G. Scudder wrote:

> Also, the fact that one non-obvious casualty of using next hop as 
> identifier has been identified leads me to be concerned that others, as 
> yet unidentified, may also exist. 

I'd like to suggest that rough consensus has been reached that the 
next-hop attribute is not a viable path identifier. Except for the 
authors, is there anyone that doesn't consider this to be a "self 
evident truth" by now ?

  Pedro.

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr