Re: [Idr] Progressing draft-bhatia-bgp-multiple-next-hops-01.txt

[Jeffrey Haas <jhaas at pfrc.org>]

On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 02:11:03PM -0400, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> I suggest that NEITHER internet-draft be considered as a WG item at
> this point, multiple-next-hops because it won't work and add-paths
> because it is too vague as it stands.

I heartily support this.

That said, I think that the discussion has spurred us to talk about
the problem space.  We should continue this discussion.

-- Jeff

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr