[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)

To: iesg at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)
From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs at cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:14:01 -0400
Authentication-results: rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=jgs@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
Cc: idr at ietf.org
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=246; t=1160500451; x=1161364451; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jgs@cisco.com; z=From:=22John=20G.=20Scudder=22=20<jgs@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20[Idr]=20Last=20Call=3A=20'Canonical=20representation=20of=204-by te=20AS=0A=20numbers'=20to=20Informational=20RFC=20(draft-michaelson-4byte- as-representation) |To:iesg@ietf.org; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DOjXQuNGhOTIGgIBYbh28tMSyR40=3D; b=i2tx0XdXuKshi/YfNnECkbdUkArRcKQmBX3WN9DORFNLAACh3T7pRG4GCOVNcZggf8WHqyFk umLlBDuy/P5OUmU2mLRuNpCWE5Unyle1xCdj+jMNoGPkHJNu5NKGEV5u;
In-reply-to: <E1GX06V-0006wb-4J@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1GX06V-0006wb-4J@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>

I'm inclined to agree with others who've expressed a slight preference for a simple decimal integer representation. I think the (lack of) technical issues with doing so has already been pretty well captured in the conversation.

--John

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum

References:
- [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)
  - From: The IESG

Prev by Date: Re: [Idr] Re: Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)
Next by Date: Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)
Previous by thread: RE: [Idr] Re: Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte ASnumbers' to Informational RFC(draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)
Next by thread: Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread