Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>]

On 11-okt-2006, at 22:32, Curtis Villamizar wrote:

> How the protocol encodes an atribute does not impact how that
> attribute is displayed in the CLI and therefore how or whether an RE
> syntax could be used in policy statements.

I don't understand how these statements relate to the discussion at  
hand.

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr