Re: [Idr] Fwd:I-D ACTION:draft-pmohapat-idr-acceptown-community-01.txt

[Danny McPherson <danny at tcb.net>]

Regarding all your other text, I don't have any new points
to make and haven't changed my position, so I'll avoid
further discussion on that.

> Recently we have had hussars bashing "BGP overload" ... now in 2008
> perhaps we see a new trend "routing hygiene". So can you spell what is
> so unhygienic in this draft ? All points you have brought so far talk
> about solved issue (in the VPN space) if reflecting unneeded routes to
> PEs ... but non of your points refer to this draft. Can you put in
> points how this draft make this any worse ?

It's "be liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you
send", NOT "be liberal in what you send because others
are liberal in what they accept" :-)

I understand the utility of your proposal, I understand why
you selected the mechanism you did.  My concern is that all
these tweaks have system-wide implications, and we all
need to be cognizant of that when proposing solutions to
problems operators have.

-danny







_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr