Re: [Idr] Posting of IPR Disclosure for draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>]

The normal process is that the WG considers all aspects, technical and 
IPR, and makes a decision that they want to proceed.

From my personal perspective the license conditions appear quite 
reasonable, should be OK even from open source point of view. But there 
is one word that troubled me a bit. Can we get anyone from Juniper to 
clarify whether "standard adopted by IETF" implies a standards track 
RFC, and NOT only full Standard (which might never be reached)?

But in any case, particularly since the IPR declarations came in so 
late, I think it would be best if the WG made an official decision (new 
WGLC) about this issue. I believe there are a few technical discusses 
from the IESG review today, so you could handle that in parallel.

Jari