Hi Jeff,
Are the objects' names going to changed for the drafts which
receive an early mib-2 subid allocation vs. the RFC versions?
The reason that I'm asking is that not all the tools identify
objects using their OIDs, many use the objects' names. If the
objects' names remain the same between the draft MIB Modules
and the RFC MIB Modules, then this could cause problems.
Thanks,
-Joan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey Haas" <jhaas at pfrc.org>
To: <idr at ietf.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 10:24 AM Subject: Re: [Idr] BGP MIBv2 updates
I was requested to be a little more clear here. On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:50:42PM -0500, Jeffrey Haas wrote:In order to encourage implementation of these drafts, I'd like to request anearly allocation from the mib-2 space for these MIBs.I'd like to request an early allocation from mib-2 for the following SNMP MODULE-IDENTITYs. bgp4V2, published in draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-09. bgp4V2TC, published in draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-tc-mib-00. _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr at ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr