Re: [Idr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-scudder-idr-optional-transitive-00

["John G. Scudder" <jgs at juniper.net>]

Hi Robert,

On Mar 3, 2009, at 5:11 AM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Do we making in this draft an implicit assumption that transitive  
> attribute malformation must always happen day one and not after the  
> original advertisement have already left the originator ?

No, the draft applies equally regardless of where the malformation is  
introduced.

> I think the current text at least suggest that if withdraw of NLRIs  
> is possible when we drop the update let's dispatch it.

Sorry, didn't follow the above.

> Two additional points to the claim that dropping the session is  
> worst thing ...

I'd be interested in feedback from the WG regarding the question of  
withdrawing the routes (what the draft proposes) vs. dropping the  
session (current behavior).  Especially feedback from network operators.

--John