Re: [Idr] Response to comments on generalized RT constrain solution

[Robert Raszuk <raszuk at cisco.com>]

> > > 3. BTW, there is another issue regarding to the length of the RT
> > > filed, the IPv6 address specified RT is covered in rfc4684.
> >
> > Can you clarify what is the issue ?
>
> Here is the RT difinition in RFC4684:
> +-------------------------------+
> | origin as        (4 octets)   |
> +-------------------------------+
> | route target     (8 octets)   |
> +                               +
> |                               |
> +-------------------------------+
>
> There is only 8 octets left for route target.

Why do you need more ? RFC4360 is quite clear on route target format and 
it is 8 octets.

RFC4684 just talks about IPv4 or IPv6 next hops to be used as part of 
MP_REACH_NLRI. That has nothing to do with different RT format.

Cheers,
R.