Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep recharter

[ken carlberg <carlberg at g11.org.uk>]

Jon,

would it be possible to pass along the comments that Sam sent to the  
IESG?  He asked if you could (in response to a message from me a  
couple of weeks ago) in the IETF mailing list, and I would appreciate  
more information on this decision -- at least the information that  
Sam said he felt comfortable sharing.

regards,

-ken


On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:30 AM, Peterson, Jon wrote:

> To the IEPREP WG,
>
> After considerable deliberation within the IESG, I am sorry to  
> report that the IESG is not comfortable approving the IEPREP  
> charter as it stands.
>
> In particular, the IESG is concerned about a perceived lack of  
> focus in the deliverables, and collectively feels that it is  
> difficult to assess the support of the community for this charter.  
> Some of the open-endedness in the charter about non-real-time  
> communications has given rise to questions about the diverse  
> expertise required to complete the work. Concerns about whether or  
> not the IETF is the proper venue for this work continue to be  
> expressed within the IESG as well.
>
> At this time, the rough consensus in the IESG is that in order for  
> the charter to progress, the community would have to affirm its  
> support for the work in the context of a BoF. The IESG is willing  
> to participate in honing the charter for such a BoF if this is the  
> direction you'd like to take it.
>
> I am sorry after such a long time to be returning with another  
> negative response. I do believe that the response reflects an  
> informed consensus of the IESG.
>
> Jon Peterson
> NeuStar, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ieprep mailing list
> Ieprep at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep


_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
Ieprep at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep