Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt



At 01:56 07-11-2007, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I submitted both of the following:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-header-im-00

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-header-pres-00

Thanks.

I'm not sure what you mean by "feature". According to RFC 2779, IM and
presence are separate domains of functionality, which is why there is an
im: URI scheme and a pres: URI sng my promise to work on
a more generic solution.

Could we have only one I-D which is extensible to encompass all these schemes? I assume that will be draft-saintandre-header-pres-01.


BTW, the Author's address in your draft seems incomplete.

Regards,
-sm




_______________________________________________
Ietf-message-headers mailing list
Ietf-message-headers at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.