:-( Thanks, Spencer
I don't know what to make of that text. While I can imagine exceptions, as a general rule that is so obviously a bad idea that it never occurred to me it was within the rules.Joel Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:Hi Ralph, Joel et al.I looks like there is no common understanding of the following part of RFC 3777:"It is consistent with this rule for current nominating committee members who have served on prior nominating committees to advise the current committee on deliberations and results of the prior committee, as necessary and appropriate."Could anybody explain this further (what does this forbid/allow?), and in particular for what reason it was put there when RFC 3777 was drafted?cheers, Bernie On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Ralph Droms wrote:Joel - I agree with your interpretation of the confidentiality requirements. When I was in the situation you are in now, as past NomCom chair I do not think I had the right to make any of the information from the NomCom I chaired to the subsequent NomCom to which I was an advisor. And I would not want to change that rule.- Ralph On Jun 3, 2009, at 9:01 AM 6/3/09, Joel M. Halpern wrote:I don't read things the same way you do.I don't think someone who was on nomcom A and is now on nomcom B can tell B "nomcom A, in discussing person X, found major problem Y." Nor, in fact, can they relay any other aspects of the discussion within nomcom A to nomcom B.They can say "Personally, I have problem Y with person X." There are of course multiple gray areas in between.Assuming that my reading is accurate, I would also prefer not to change that. (To take an extreme example, I have a fairly good archive of last year's nomcom. As far as I am concerned I can not, and should not be allowed to, forward that archive to Mary, or to her committee, even though I am an advisor to that committee and presumably allowed to provide personally known factual information to that committee.)Yours, Joel Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:Hi,Reviewing the latest "openlist" reminded me of some earlier question / suggestion I made earlier to the ietf-nomcom list. So far I have not got any feedback. Probably as it was buried under some much hotter topic (in the same email)...Here is comes again: * 3rd paragraph and former NomCom members: "It is consistent with this rule for current nominating committee members who have served on prior nominating committees to advise the current committee on deliberations and results of the prior committee, as necessary and appropriate." As I understand this, current NomCom members who have served on priorNomComs are allowed to share information they have as a result of theirmembership in prior NomComs. - Could anybody confirm, that my understanding about this is correct? * Suggestion for change: I suggest to explicitely allow any member of a former NomCom to sharewith the current NomCom any information relevant to the current NomCom.Such kind of information is most useful to current NomComs. - Any opinions on changing this as suggested? - How about changing this along with "openlist"? (Note that this part of RFC 3777 is already cited in "openlist".) cheers, Bernie _______________________________________________ ietf-nomcom mailing list ietf-nomcom at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom_______________________________________________ ietf-nomcom mailing list ietf-nomcom at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom_______________________________________________ ietf-nomcom mailing list ietf-nomcom at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.