[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ietf-nomcom] Confidentiality and information from former NomCom members



--On Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:23 -0500 Spencer Dawkins
<spencer at wonderhamster.org> wrote:

> OK, I'd really like for someone to tell us what this text was
> intended to allow, because I'm seeing a past NomCom chair
> saying that it's obviously broken, but the text is in the
> process BCP...
> 
> :-(

I'd be happy to hear from  the author of that text (whomever
that might be), but I believe it is more or less consistent with
my earlier note:

Nomcom N should reasonably have access to information about
general criteria, decision processes, and procedures used from
Nomcom N-1 (and possibly N-2 and further back).  That
information may be used to inform Nomcom choices about processes
and criteria, but Nomcom N may also move in different directions
--at their discretion and within whatever constrains exist in
3777 and its offspring.

Neither Nomcom N nor anyone else get access to information about
actual candidates, candidate statements, input about candidates,
or Nomcom discussion of candidates.

In other words, "deliberations and results" is about principles
and process, not candidates.  Otherwise, this text would be,
IMO, hopelessly inconsistent with the rest of 3777.

   john





Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.