Leslie. John C Klensin wrote:
--On Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:23 -0500 Spencer Dawkins <spencer at wonderhamster.org> wrote:OK, I'd really like for someone to tell us what this text was intended to allow, because I'm seeing a past NomCom chair saying that it's obviously broken, but the text is in the process BCP... :-(I'd be happy to hear from the author of that text (whomever that might be), but I believe it is more or less consistent with my earlier note: Nomcom N should reasonably have access to information about general criteria, decision processes, and procedures used from Nomcom N-1 (and possibly N-2 and further back). That information may be used to inform Nomcom choices about processes and criteria, but Nomcom N may also move in different directions --at their discretion and within whatever constrains exist in 3777 and its offspring. Neither Nomcom N nor anyone else get access to information about actual candidates, candidate statements, input about candidates, or Nomcom discussion of candidates. In other words, "deliberations and results" is about principles and process, not candidates. Otherwise, this text would be, IMO, hopelessly inconsistent with the rest of 3777. john _______________________________________________ ietf-nomcom mailing list ietf-nomcom at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reality:
Yours to discover."
-- ThinkingCat
Leslie Daigle
leslie at thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.