IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F431A0136 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:20:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SV2YMbCAAMTW for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:20:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-x236.google.com (mail-pb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC741A0129 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:20:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ma3so1427235pbc.27 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:20:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LtALRIl2zjsW7tkTXNMce48Njc4UDTEksAMwXQ02MqI=; b=k5dpNrWq722wdve1NRWDqgKJMLveS2RC7wxHtTajNcYhMfD/phWDErAOZiVrNUz2Ur 3xPH0ki6u8V1mqpKhYZNYYC0dYaZG1QW9Ctpotw7C/qk4p2NXXZ1DOxZ8Vc9KfNq0Kk5 VlN+jCZm6qBMxxALRFj6DRY9HV4q1YLYPnoFIOeuiucvmNBprmdF3O/LWgV5b4IFCwhQ GNbcPtT3+DyjdrZIv09MZ6Da51xhjWLFo//07nokeMM71+bmiwrgI6H9kxNPz0y0mHYG pghMQ0iw1oMLhq2v8wrTtYOHuuqiLg2cU31V9xqCCG0dmfTrRKLzMhadSlmYdXGzHYzD LqDw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.13.138 with SMTP id h10mr8773345pac.148.1394043633335; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:20:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.220.102 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:20:33 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 18:20:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYUv=MZuk6Qcjsmu5up4b-TfyK5nQKYwWT=bxKnAt3_2g@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec520ee1f91030204f3e0133f"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/qZN685M0PINqiQGbgHQdbL-URYA
Subject: [ietf-smtp] Per-Recipient Data Responses
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 18:20:38 -0000

How come this never got adoption?  It comes up from time to time in "We
really should do this" sorts of discussions, but it doesn't seem like
anyone ever took the plunge and it just expired.  Is it just that nobody
does it because nobody else does it?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hall-prdr-00

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email