IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]

Jun 28 2011

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Rolf E. Sonneveld
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Mark Andrews

Jun 27 2011

Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Noel Chiappa
Re: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard, Paul Ford-Hutchinson
Anyone need a room at the Hilton?, Randall Gellens
Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp-14, IJsbrand Wijnands
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Joel Jaeggli
RE: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard, Robert McMurray
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Scott Rose
GEN-ART review for draft-li-pwe3-ms-pw-pon-03, kathleen.moriarty
Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-roll-of0-14, Roni Even
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Ole Troan
Operations Directorate Review of draft-ietf-soc-overload-design, Warren Kumari

Jun 26 2011

Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Mark Andrews
Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-05 (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Joel Jaeggli
draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-05 (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, SM
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt> (Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF) to BCP, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Barry Leiba
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Barry Leiba

Jun 25 2011

Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Pete Resnick
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22.txt> (Update to DNAME Redirection in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, SM
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt> (Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF) to BCP, SM
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, SM
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Noel Chiappa
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin
RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John Leslie
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, SM
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, SM
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Tim Chown
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Christian Huitema
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Cullen Jennings
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Masataka Ohta
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Noel Chiappa
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, james woodyatt
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Joel Jaeggli

Jun 24 2011

Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, james woodyatt
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Dave CROCKER
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Ben Campbell
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Doug Barton
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Doug Barton
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John Leslie
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Doug Barton
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Doug Barton
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Cameron Byrne
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Donald Eastlake
RE: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard, Robert McMurray
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Julian Reschke
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Martin Rex
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Noel Chiappa
Re: RFC production center XML format usage, was: [IAOC] xml2rfc and legal services RFPs, Julian Reschke
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Julian Reschke
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Martin Rex
Nomcom 2011-2012: Second Call for Volunteers, Suresh Krishnan
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Donald Eastlake
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Melinda Shore
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Al Iverson
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Douglas Otis
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Andrew Sullivan
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Noel Chiappa
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Martin Rex
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, RJ Atkinson
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Paul Hoffman
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, RJ Atkinson
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Scott Rose
Agenda for IETF 81 not available, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Donald Eastlake
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Stephen Farrell
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Paul Hoffman
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Paul Hoffman
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John Leslie
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Scott Kitterman
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Yang C Sijes
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Stephen Farrell
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, t.petch
Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02, Roni Even
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp-14, Joel M. Halpern
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Paul Hoffman
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Melinda Shore
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Peter Saint-Andre

Jun 23 2011

Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Paul Hoffman
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, John Levine
TSVDIR review request - draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-multihoming-without-ipv6nat, David Harrington
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Lachlan Hunt
Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document., Michael StJohns
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Doug Otis
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Barry Leiba

Jun 22 2011

Re: Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback, Mark Nottingham
Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Dave CROCKER
Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Ole Jacobsen
Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document., Scott O. Bradner
Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document., Michael StJohns
Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Krishna Birth
Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Krishna Birth
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Dave CROCKER
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Scott Kitterman
RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
Google to Host IETF Meeting, IETF Administrative Director
RE: Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback, Paul E. Jones
Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document., Scott Brim
Re: whine, whine, whine, John Levine
Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document., John C Klensin
External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document., Michael StJohns
Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Ted Ts'o
tools.ietf.org problem with RFC-to-be6282 (AUTH48), Mathieu Goessens
Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Dave Cridland
Re: whine, whine, whine, Scott Brim
Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Ray Bellis
Re: whine, whine, whine, Ray Bellis
Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04, Ole Troan
My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Krishna Birth
Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback, Mark Nottingham
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Douglas Otis

Jun 21 2011

Re: 25 or 6to4, Keith Moore
Re: 25 or 6to4, Steve Crocker
Re: 25 or 6to4, Ralph Droms
Re: 25 or 6to4, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: 25 or 6to4, Ralph Droms
25 or 6to4, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: whine, whine, whine, Jari Arkko
RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Murray S. Kucherawy
RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Murray S. Kucherawy
RE: whine, whine, whine, Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: whine, whine, whine, RJ Atkinson
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, t.petch
RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, John C Klensin
Re: location preferences, Dave CROCKER
Re: whine, whine, whine, Eliot Lear
Re: whine, whine, whine, Ray Bellis
Re: whine, whine, whine, John Levine
Re: whine, whine, whine, Klaas Wierenga
Re: whine, whine, whine, Tim Chown
Re: whine, whine, whine, CAUCHIE Grégory
Re: whine, whine, whine, Ray Bellis
RE: whine, whine, whine, Christer Holmberg
Re: whine, whine, whine, Simon Perreault
Re: whine, whine, whine, Simon Perreault
RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Adrian Farrel
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Lou Berger
Re: location preferences, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Keith Moore
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Thomas Heide Clausen
Re: whine, whine, whine, John R. Levine
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, John Levine
Re: whine, whine, whine, Randall Gellens
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Mark Andrews
getting there, John Levine
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Henk Uijterwaal
Thanks! (was: Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?), Keith Moore
RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Joel Jaeggli
RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn
whine, whine, whine, John Levine
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Stephan Wenger
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Henk Uijterwaal
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Randall Gellens
Re: location preferences, James M. Polk

Jun 20 2011

Re: Getting to Quebec City, Julien Laganier
Re: location preferences, Dave CROCKER
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Randall Gellens
RE: location preferences, Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: location preferences, Dave CROCKER
location preferences (was: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?), Andrew Sullivan
RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Mary Barnes
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, John C Klensin
IETF-meta (Was: Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?), Richard L. Barnes
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Simon Perreault
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Michael Richardson
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Thomas Nadeau
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Ole Jacobsen
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Keith Moore
Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC, Carsten Bormann
RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, John E Drake
Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC, Cullen Jennings
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Simon Perreault
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Bob Hinden
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Henk Uijterwaal

Jun 18 2011

Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn

Jun 18 2011

Re: Getting to Quebec City, Tim Chown
Re: Getting to Quebec City, John R. Levine
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Ole Jacobsen
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Alastair Johnson
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Michael StJohns
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Ole Jacobsen
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Scott Brim
Re: Getting to Quebec City, John R. Levine
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Mary Barnes
Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, John Levine
Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Keith Moore
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Glen Zorn
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Glen Zorn
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Hamza GHARSALLAH
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Andrew Sullivan
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Melinda Shore
Re: Getting to Quebec City, Eric Rescorla
Getting to Quebec City, John Levine

Jun 17 2011

Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-08, Ben Campbell
Gen-ART LC Review of draft-law-rfc4869bis-01, Ben Campbell
Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC, Donald Eastlake
Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04, Ben Campbell
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Boris Zbarsky
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Michael Richardson
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Lachlan Hunt
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
RE: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Boris Zbarsky
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt> (Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF) to BCP, Barry Leiba
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt> (Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF) to BCP, Mykyta Yevstifeyev

Jun 16 2011

Jun 15 2011

IETF Fellowship Announcement (IETF 82 and 83), Steve Conte
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-07, Avi Lior
Re: Liaison and request for review of ITU-T document, Ralph Droms
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-07, Ben Campbell
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Boris Zbarsky
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Christian Huitema
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke
Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Mark Andrews
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Noel Chiappa

Jun 14 2011

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Mark Smith
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Erik Kline
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Mark Smith
Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt> (Diameter IKEv2 PSK: Pre-Shared Secret-based Support for IKEv2 Server to Diameter Server Interaction) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Tony Hain
Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt> (Diameter IKEv2 PSK: Pre-Shared Secret-based Support for IKEv2 Server to Diameter Server Interaction) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer
RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-07, Cakulev, Violeta (Violeta)
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Joel Jaeggli
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore
RE: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt> (Diameter IKEv2 PSK: Pre-Shared Secret-based Support for IKEv2 Server to Diameter Server Interaction) to Proposed Standard, Cakulev, Violeta (Violeta)
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Joel Jaeggli
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Tony Hain
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Ole Troan
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, james woodyatt
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Tim Chown
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore

Jun 13 2011

Nomcom 2011-12: Call for Volunteers, Suresh Krishnan
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, t.petch
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Steven Bellovin
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Ofer Inbar
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Joel Jaeggli
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Joel Jaeggli
Re: RE: RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Noel Chiappa
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Noel Chiappa
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, t.petch
Re: RE: RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Cameron Byrne
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, t.petch
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Jari Arkko
RE: RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py
Re: RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Cameron Byrne
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py

Jun 12 2011

Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Doug Barton
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Nathaniel Borenstein
Re: [PCN] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-08.txt> (PCN Boundary Node Behaviour for the Controlled Load (CL) Mode of Operation) to Informational RFC, Tom Taylor
TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname, Joe Touch
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pppext-trill-protocol-06.txt> (PPP TRILL Protocol Control Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Jari Arkko
Bring Your Own Server, Krishna Birth
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John R. Levine

Jun 11 2011

Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michael Richardson
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Hamza GHARSALLAH
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John Levine
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, ned+ietf
Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Masataka Ohta
Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Julian Reschke
Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John Levine
Itojun Service Award Announcement, Jun Murai
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Mark Andrews
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Masataka Ohta

Jun 10 2011

Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Mark Andrews
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Mark Andrews
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John C Klensin
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, james woodyatt
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Liaison and request for review of ITU-T document, Brian E Carpenter
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Masataka Ohta
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Brian E Carpenter
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Dave Cridland
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John C Klensin
RFP for Secretariat Services, IETF Administrative Director
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, james woodyatt
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, james woodyatt
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Keith Moore
RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Templin, Fred L
Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-08, Elwyn Davies
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Joel Jaeggli
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Michael Richardson
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michael Richardson
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, james woodyatt
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John C Klensin
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Noel Chiappa
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Nathaniel Borenstein
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Worley, Dale R (Dale)
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Tony Hain
Re: Last Call: <draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-01.txt> (Conclusion of FYI RFC Sub-series) to Informational RFC, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John C Klensin
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Brian E Carpenter
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Bert (IETF) Wijnen
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Thomas Nadeau
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, TJ
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, otunte otueneh
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Stefan Winter
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, otunte otueneh
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Stefan Winter
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Roger Jørgensen
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Hector Santos
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Martin Rex
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Mark Andrews
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Masataka Ohta
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Randy Presuhn
Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Mark Andrews
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Keith Moore

Jun 09 2011

Jun 08 2011

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, james woodyatt
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Tim Chown
Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Ben Campbell
RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Dmitry Anipko
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Joel Jaeggli
compromise on the 6to4->Historic debate, Keith Moore
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Martin Rex
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore
RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, George, Wesley
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Randy Presuhn
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Summary for IESG last call to 5892bis draft, Pete Resnick
Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Scott Rose
Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Scott Rose
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, james woodyatt
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Noel Chiappa
Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Martin Rex
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-12.txt> (Subnet Allocation Option) to Informational RFC, Alexandru Petrescu
Re: Contents of the IDNA Derived Properties registry (was; Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04), Russ Housley
Contents of the IDNA Derived Properties registry (was; Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04), John C Klensin
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, John C Klensin
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, Alexey Melnikov
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, Alexey Melnikov
Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Dave Cridland
Summary for IESG last call to 5892bis draft, Jiankang YAO
Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Andrew Sullivan
Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Pete Resnick
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, Vint Cerf
Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Peter Saint-Andre
Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-vcat-lcas-13, kathleen.moriarty
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, Paul Hoffman
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, John C Klensin

Jun 07 2011

Mail converted by MHonArc