IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Aug 05 2008
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC review: draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07, Joel M. Halpern
• Aug 04 2008
• Re: avoiding pitfalls in v4/v6 NAT (was Re: About IETF communication skills), Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Brian E Carpenter
• RE: [Gen-art] IETF LC review: draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07, Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Joel Jaeggli
• Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC review: draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07, Joel M. Halpern
• Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Noel Chiappa
• Re: "reality" vs. "principle" (was Re: About IETF communication skills), Noel Chiappa
• Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon, Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Dan York
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Dan York
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Marshall Eubanks
• Last Call: draft-reschke-webdav-search (Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) SEARCH) to Proposed Standard, Tobias.Schlauch
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Eric Rescorla
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, John Leslie
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Matthew J Zekauskas
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Frank Ellermann
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Frank Ellermann
• Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08, Julian Reschke
• Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08, Frank Ellermann
• RE: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
• Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08, Julian Reschke
• RE: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
• Re: Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Spencer Dawkins
• Aug 03 2008
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Keith Moore
• Re: avoiding pitfalls in v4/v6 NAT (was Re: About IETF communication skills), Keith Moore
• Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon, Joel Jaeggli
• RE: About IETF communication skills, michael.dillon
• Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: avoiding pitfalls in v4/v6 NAT (was Re: About IETF communication skills), Noel Chiappa
• Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon, Joel Jaeggli
• Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon, Joel Jaeggli
• Re: avoiding pitfalls in v4/v6 NAT (was Re: About IETF communication skills), Keith Moore
• Re: MP3 support for Friday afternoon, Lixia Zhang
• MP3 support for Friday afternoon, Marshall Eubanks
• Proposals to improve the scribe situation, Marshall Eubanks
• Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08, Julian Reschke
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: avoiding pitfalls in v4/v6 NAT (was Re: About IETF communication skills), Noel Chiappa
• Aug 02 2008
• Re: Disappointing to not have plenary slides online for remote participants..., Dave Crocker
• Re: Be aware when traveling to the USA., Bill McQuillan
• Re: Be aware when traveling to the USA., Jeroen Massar
• Re: Be aware when traveling to the USA., Truman Boyes
• avoiding pitfalls in v4/v6 NAT (was Re: About IETF communication skills), Keith Moore
• Re: "reality" vs. "principle" (was Re: About IETF communication skills), Keith Moore
• Fwd: Current Nomcom selection status, Danny McPherson
• Re: Be aware when traveling to the USA., Steven M. Bellovin
• Be aware when traveling to the USA., Franck Martin
• Aug 01 2008
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
• "reality" vs. "principle" (was Re: About IETF communication skills), Keith Moore
• There are several flaws in RFC 3934 's Suspension Processes require Notice when a Suspension is Lifted., TS Glassey
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Geoff Huston
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Keith Moore
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Keith Moore
• Re: Disappointing to not have plenary slides online for remote participants..., Russ Housley
• Re: About IETF communication skills, ned+ietf
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Noel Chiappa
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Mark Seery
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Fred Baker
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Frank Ellermann
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Steven M. Bellovin
• 2009 Venues & Hosts Set, Ray Pelletier
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Keith Moore
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Carsten Bormann
• Re: About IETF communication skills, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Ole Jacobsen
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Paul Hoffman
• RE: About IETF communication skills, Tony Hain
• Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
• RE: About IETF communication skills, John Morris
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Stephen Farrell
• Jul 31 2008
• RE: About IETF communication skills, michael.dillon
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Steven M. Bellovin
• RE: About IETF communication skills, michael.dillon
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Keith Moore
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Keith Moore
• Re: About IETF communication skills, ned+ietf
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Randy Presuhn
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Keith Moore
• Re: About IETF communication skills, ned+ietf
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Ted Faber
• Re: About IETF communication skills, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Daniel Brown
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Joel Jaeggli
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Daniel Brown
• Re: Disappointing to not have plenary slides online for remote participants..., Olaf Kolkman
• Re: About IETF communication skills, Lixia Zhang
• Webpages for Hiroshima info, Ole Jacobsen
• Disappointing to not have plenary slides online for remote participants..., Dan York
• About IETF communication skills, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream, Harald Alvestrand
• Re: IAB Open Microphone session on Thursday?, David Kessens
• Re: IAB Open Microphone session on Thursday?, Dave Crocker
• Re: IAB Open Microphone session on Thursday?, Olaf Kolkman
• Re: IAB Open Microphone session on Thursday?, David Kessens
• Re: IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream, Russ Housley
• Re: IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream, Harald Alvestrand
• Jul 30 2008
• RE: [Capwap] Last call comments for capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07, Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
• RE: [Capwap] Last call comments for capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07, Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
• RE: [Capwap] Last call comments for capwap-threat-analysis-01, Pasi.Eronen
• IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream, The IESG
• Jul 29 2008
• IAB's Introduction to the Wed Technical Plenary, Gregory Lebovitz
• Re: FYA: I bet this will confuse a few users..., Stephane Bortzmeyer
• FYA: I bet this will confuse a few users..., Brian E Carpenter
• Re: GEOPRIV and ECRIT experiments at IETF 72, Richard Barnes
• GEOPRIV and ECRIT experiments at IETF 72, Richard Barnes
• Last call comments for capwap-threat-analysis-01, Pasi.Eronen
• Need XP recovery, anyone have the CD?, Robert Moskowitz
• Last call comments for capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-07, Pasi.Eronen
• Re: Missing Materials, Dean Willis
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Jari Arkko
• Jul 28 2008
• Racom Card Found, Christian Vogt
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits), Frank Ellermann
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject, Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject, Frank Ellermann
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits), ned+ietf
• RE: [Capwap] Last call comments for capwap-protocol-specification-11, Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject, ned+ietf
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits), Scott Kitterman
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits), Frank Ellermann
• RE: request for comments -- how to?, michael.dillon
• request for comments -- how to?, dig asm
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits), Alexey Melnikov
• Re: NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair, Lars Eggert
• Found Safeword Platinum tokencard, Julien Laganier
• NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair, Marc Manthey
• Re: Chairs: Helping out remote participants, Dan York
• Chairs: Helping out remote participants, Philip Matthews
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (procedural nits), Frank Ellermann
• Jul 27 2008
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject, Frank Ellermann
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Ietf-krb-wg] Late Last Call comments: draft-ietf-krb-wg-anonymous, Larry Zhu
• RE: [Ietf-krb-wg] Late Last Call comments: draft-ietf-krb-wg-anonymous, Larry Zhu
• RE: [Ietf-krb-wg] Late Last Call Comment: draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming-04.txt, Larry Zhu
• RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming-04.txt, Larry Zhu
• Jul 26 2008
• Last call comments for capwap-protocol-specification-11, Pasi.Eronen
• IETF-75: sailing to Stockholm, Lars Eggert
• Re: Draft IAOC Administrative Policy, Dave Crocker
• Re: Draft IAOC Administrative Policy, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Missing Materials, Harald Alvestrand
• Draft IAOC Administrative Policy, Ray Pelletier
• DVD MOVIES NUEVOS TITULOS EN DVD, dvdmovies21072008 at gmail.com
• Jul 25 2008
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Daniel Brown
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Fred Baker
• Last Call comments on draft-sanchez-webdav-current-principal-01, Julian Reschke
• Audio Streaming - IETF 72 July 27th - August 1st, Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Missing Materials, Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Missing Materials, Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Missing Materials, Joel Jaeggli
• Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
• Jul 24 2008
• Re: Missing Materials, Eric Rescorla
• Re: Teleconf [Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73], Marc Manthey
• Re: Missing Materials, Jari Arkko
• Re: Missing Materials, Frank Ellermann
• Teleconf [Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73], Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Missing Materials, Stewart Bryant
• Missing Materials, Eric Rescorla
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marc Manthey
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eric Burger
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eric Burger
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marc Manthey
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marc Manthey
• RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Russ Housley
• Re: www3.tools.ietf.org very heavily loaded, Henrik Levkowetz
• CUATRICICLOS 0Km TODAS LAS MARCAS, primmis21072008 at gmail.com
• Jul 23 2008
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: left mailing list, Daniel Brown
• left mailing list, Huntak Lee
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eric Burger
• www3.tools.ietf.org very heavily loaded, Henrik Levkowetz
• Jul 22 2008
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Fred Baker
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Fred Baker
• RE: [netlmm] WG Review: Recharter of Network-based Localized Mobility Management (netlmm), Koodli, Rajeev
• RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, David Harrington
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks
• Jul 21 2008
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf
• RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, michael.dillon
• Re: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Michelle Cotton
• Re: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, James Cloos
• Re: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, michael.dillon
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker
• RE: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Eric Gray
• Re: [netlmm] WG Review: Recharter of Network-based Localized Mobility Management (netlmm), Charles E. Perkins
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Fred Baker
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, John C Klensin
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Fred Baker
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Ned Freed
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Ned Freed
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John C Klensin
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Nathaniel Borenstein
• Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised-05, Elwyn Davies
• RE: Draft Trust Policy re: Rights in IETF Documents, Contreras, Jorge
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, John C Klensin
• RE: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf
• RE: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Eric Gray
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Tom.Petch
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Cridland
• Jul 20 2008
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Network-based Localized Mobility Management (netlmm), Jari Arkko
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John C Klensin
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Dave Crocker
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Russ Housley
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Pete Resnick
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Spencer Dawkins
• COMPUTADORA ATHLON $999, asamblea20072008
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Dave Crocker
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Dave Crocker
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Brian E Carpenter
• Jul 19 2008
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John Leslie
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John C Klensin
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Dave Crocker
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Jari Arkko
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Russ Housley
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John C Klensin
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Scott Brim
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John C Klensin
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, ned+ietf
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, John C Klensin
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Scott Brim
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Jari Arkko
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eliot Lear
• Jul 18 2008
• Re: Will IPv4 be turned off at IETF 72?, Russ Housley
• Will IPv4 be turned off at IETF 72?, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, James M. Polk
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Adrian Farrel
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, James Galvin
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eliot Lear
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, James Cloos
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Keith Moore
• Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Russ Housley
• Re: Conference calls (Was: Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73), Spencer Dawkins
• RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Mary Barnes
• Conference calls (Was: Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73), Jari Arkko
• RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Mary Barnes
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Mary Barnes
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eliot Lear
• Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings, Adrian Farrel
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Andy Bierman
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Cyrus Daboo
• RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Mary Barnes
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Cyrus Daboo
• Re: Draft Trust Policy re: Rights in IETF Documents, C.T. Aiken
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Russ Housley
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Russ Housley
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eliot Lear
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Jari Arkko
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eric Rescorla
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Keith Moore
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eric Rosen
• Re: Draft Trust Policy re: Rights in IETF Documents, Frank Ellermann
• Draft Trust Policy re: Rights in IETF Documents, Ray Pelletier
• RE: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, michael.dillon
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Eliot Lear
• Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Bill Manning
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, John C Klensin
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks
• Jul 17 2008
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Tony Hansen
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Russ Housley
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Adrian Farrel
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Russ Housley
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Dave Crocker
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, James M. Polk
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Tony Hansen
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Paul Hoffman
• Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, Robert Sparks
• Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73, IETF Chair
• Re: Last Call: draft-reschke-webdav-search (Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) SEARCH) to Proposed Standard, Javier Godoy
• IAOC & IAD Dublin Office Hours, Ray Pelletier
• Jul 16 2008
• IANA "Office Hours" at IETF-72 in Dublin, Michelle Cotton
• Jul 15 2008
• Re: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, Michelle Cotton
• Re: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, Laura Webster
• Re: IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Julian Reschke
• Call for discussion of draft-dawkins-nomcom-3777-issues-00, Russ Housley
• Jul 14 2008
• IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML, Michelle Cotton
• RE: Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07, Mary Barnes
• Jul 13 2008
• Audio Streaming - IETF 72 July 28th - August 1st, Joel Jaeggli
• Jul 12 2008
• Dearest One,, Miss Joy Ogeh
• Jul 11 2008
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, John C Klensin
• New IETF Journal available now (Volume 4, Issue 1), Mirjam Kuehne
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Keith Moore
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Eliot Lear
• Why we need two seperate tables for inbound and outbound in draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-atm-mib-05.txt, Murugesan Ramalingam
• Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
• Jul 10 2008
• Upcoming Jabber Server Load Test, Alexa Morris
• Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Jeroen Massar
• Re: Last Call: draft-manner-router-alert-iana (IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Option) to Proposed Standard, Joe Baptista
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: draft-manner-router-alert-iana (IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Option) to Proposed Standard, Robert Elz
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Bob Braden
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Frank Ellermann
• Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• RE: Dear ietf-archive at ietf.org 74% Savings ...3 Days Only, From
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, John C Klensin
• Jul 09 2008
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Keith Moore
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Ted Hardie
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, John C Klensin
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Keith Moore
• Re: Need some IPv6 help wiht RHEL/Centos 5, Marc Manthey
• Re: Need some IPv6 help wiht RHEL/Centos 5, Robert Moskowitz
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• More example TLDs in 2606bis? (was: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist), Frank Ellermann
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Paul Hoffman
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Bill McQuillan
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Spencer Dawkins
• Regarding missing an object in pwAtmCfgTable (draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-atm-mib-05.txt), Murugesan Ramalingam
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Thomas Narten
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bill Manning
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Frank Ellermann
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Frank Ellermann
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Brian E Carpenter
• Jul 08 2008
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Theodore Tso
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• RE: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, John C Klensin
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch
• RE: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Bert Wijnen - IETF
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, John C Klensin
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch
• RE: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Bert Wijnen - IETF
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Dave Crocker
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Pete Resnick
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Pete Resnick
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John Levine
• Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, Dave Crocker
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Tony Finch
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist, IETF Chair
• Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Touch
• Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• RE: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on therecent ICANN changes?), John C Klensin
• Re: Single-letter names, Eric Brunner-Williams
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bob Braden
• Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Late Last Call comments: draft-ietf-krb-wg-anonymous, Sam Hartman
• RE: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Cellario Luca
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John C Klensin
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Bill Manning
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John C Klensin
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Douglas Otis
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Joe Abley
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Dave Crocker
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, James Seng
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Dave Crocker
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Frank Ellermann
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• Jul 07 2008
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Mark Andrews
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bill Manning
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Theodore Tso
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Karl Auerbach
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Willie Gillespie
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Theodore Tso
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Bill Manning
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Theodore Tso
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• Re: Response to appeal [...], Frank Ellermann
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Ted Faber
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John Levine
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Bill Manning
• Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, SM
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Dave Crocker
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John Levine
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John C Klensin
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, John Levine
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Keith Moore
• Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Keith Moore
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606), Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
• RE: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on therecent ICANN changes?), Ted Hardie
• Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Francis Dupont
• RE: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on therecent ICANN changes?), michael.dillon
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John C Klensin
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Dave Crocker
• Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Dave Crocker
• RE: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?), Edmon Chung
• Re: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?), Vint Cerf
• Re: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?), William Tan
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?, Vint Cerf
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?, Lyman Chapin
• Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?, Lyman Chapin
• Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers, Ned Freed
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Jaap Akkerhuis
• Prestige Replicas your source for high-quality watches, Wendi Wynn
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Mark Andrews
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John Levine
• Need some IPv6 help wiht RHEL/Centos 5, Robert Moskowitz
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Mark Andrews
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John Levine
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Mark Andrews
• Jul 05 2008
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John C Klensin
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Brian E Carpenter
• An Internet for the Rich, LB
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John Levine
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names, Frank Ellermann
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Mark Andrews
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names, Frank Ellermann
• Watches from simple to luxurious at Prestige Replicas, Leslie Joiner
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John Levine
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names, Karl Auerbach
• RE: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?), JFC Morfin
• Jul 04 2008
• RE: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?), John C Klensin
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Mark Andrews
• Re: Single-letter names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?), John C Klensin
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?), Mark Andrews
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, Dave Crocker
• Re: Services and top-level DNS names (was: Re: Update of RFC 2606, John Levine