IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Announcements Archive]

Nov 29 2007

Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, rajesh rajesh
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
RE: Westin Vancouver Update, Yaakov Stein
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Joel Jaeggli

Nov 29 2007

RE: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Livingood, Jason
IETF 71 Info, Livingood, Jason
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Adam Roach
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis (Domain Name System (DNS)IANA Considerations) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer
RE: IETF Eurasia, Darryl \(Dassa\) Lynch
RE: Hotel selection, Livingood, Jason
RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis (Domain Name System (DNS)IANA Considerations) to BCP, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Pete Resnick
RE: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Livingood, Jason
RE: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Livingood, Jason
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, John C Klensin
Re: Westin Vancouver Update, Ted Hardie
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Sam Hartman
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Paul Hoffman
RE: IETF Eurasia, michael.dillon
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, John C Klensin
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, John C Klensin
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, John C Klensin
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Theodore Tso
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Sam Hartman
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Jari Arkko
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Alexey Melnikov
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, John C Klensin
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Dave Crocker
Re: IETF Eurasia, Adrian Farrel
Continental Distribution, Fred Baker
Re: IETF Eurasia, Fred Baker
IETF Eurasia, michael.dillon
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Norbert Bollow
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Eric Rescorla
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Julian Reschke
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Norbert Bollow
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, John C Klensin
Re: Westin Vancouver Update, Cullen Jennings
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Hotel selection, Jari Arkko
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, John C Klensin
Hotel selection, Fred Baker
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Bill Strahm
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Pekka Savola
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker
Re: Westin Vancouver Update, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Fred Baker
Re: Westin Vancouver Update, Dave Crocker
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker
Re: Missing materials, Frank Ellermann
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Eric Rescorla
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Frank Ellermann
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Sam Hartman
Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-sip-uri-list-message-02.txt, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Sam Hartman

Nov 28 2007

Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Paul Hoffman
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Tim Polk
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Ned Freed
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Eric Rescorla
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Julian Reschke
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Sam Hartman
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Cullen Jennings
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Ned Freed
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Russ Housley
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Leslie Daigle
Re: Westin Vancouver Update, Marshall Eubanks
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Ted Hardie
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Eric Rescorla
RE: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Wassim Haddad
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, John C Klensin
Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?, IETF Chair
Re: Missing materials, Eric Rescorla
RE: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Tony Li
Re: Missing materials, Frank Ellermann
Westin Vancouver Update, Ray Pelletier
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Russ Housley
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Lars Eggert
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Russ Housley
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Jari Arkko
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Lars Eggert
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Joel Jaeggli
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Pete Resnick
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Alexey Melnikov
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Alexey Melnikov
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Mohsen Souissi
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Ole Jacobsen
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Ole Jacobsen
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Peter Sylvester
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Alexey Melnikov
Re: IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Lars Eggert
Missing materials, Eric Rescorla
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, John C Klensin
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Lars Eggert
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis (Domain Name System (DNS) IANA Considerations) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Julian Reschke
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Yangwoo Ko
IETF Hosting Opportunity - March 2009, Terry Monroe
RE: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, GOLDMAN, STUART O \(STUART\)
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Marshall Rose
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Dave Crocker
RE: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Yaakov Stein
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, John Levine
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, YAO
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Fred Baker
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Sam Weiler

Nov 27 2007

Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Cullen Jennings
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Ray Pelletier
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Cullen Jennings
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Eric Rescorla
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Matt Lepinski
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Tony Li
Re: Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Pete Resnick
Westin Bayshore throwing us out, Yaakov Stein
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Jari Arkko
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Joe Abley
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Dave Crocker
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Jari Arkko
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Derek Atkins
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Sandy Ginoza
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Marshall Rose
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Paul Hoffman
Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mip4-vpn-problem-solution-03.txt, Suresh Krishnan
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Jari Arkko
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Jari Arkko
RE: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, WIJNEN, Bert \(Bert\)
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Lars Eggert
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Paul Hoffman
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Noel Chiappa
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Steven M. Bellovin

Nov 26 2007

Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Brian E Carpenter
RE: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Lakshminath Dondeti
Audio Streaming - IETF 70 Vancouver BC Canada December 2-7, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Eric Rescorla
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Spencer Dawkins
RE: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Ned Freed
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Eric Rescorla
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, John C Klensin
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Jari Arkko
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Eliot Lear
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Energy and Networks, Bruce Nordman
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Brian E Carpenter

Nov 25 2007

Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Mark Andrews
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Eric Rescorla
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Paul Hoffman
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Jari Arkko
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Jari Arkko
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Paul Hoffman
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Julian Reschke
Re: Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Paul Hoffman
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Brian E Carpenter
Lets be careful with those XML submissions to the RFC Editor, Jari Arkko
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla
Re: TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Bernard Aboba
Security area review of draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms-08.txt, glenzorn
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Hannes Tschofenig

Nov 24 2007

Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla
Re: Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Hannes Tschofenig
Last Call Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Eric Rescorla
Re: TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Spencer Dawkins
Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04, Spencer Dawkins

Nov 23 2007

Our deadlines are dizzyingly complex and confusing, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Last Call: draft-wilde-sms-uri (URI Scheme for GSM Short Message Service) to Proposed Standard, Lisa Dusseault
Re: Last Call: draft-wilde-sms-uri (URI Scheme for GSM Short Message Service) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Newton
Re: TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Bernard Aboba
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Re: [tsv-dir] Re: TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Bernard_Aboba
Re: Gen-ART review of draft-cheshire-ipv4-acd-05.txt, C. M. Heard

Nov 22 2007

Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Cullen Jennings
Re: TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Bernard Aboba
Fwd: Africa and IPv6, Marc Manthey
Re: TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
TSV-DIR Review of draft-ietf-shim6-protocol-09.txt, Bernard Aboba

Nov 21 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-wilde-sms-uri (URI Scheme for GSM Short Message Service) to Proposed Standard, Cullen Jennings
RE: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Markus.Isomaki
November 75% OFF, Canadian Doctor Nigel Elkins
Gen-art review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop-02.txt, Elwyn Davies
Re: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Colin Perkins
Re: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Ted Hardie
Re: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, James M. Polk

Nov 20 2007

Re: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Ted Hardie
Re: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Colin Perkins
Re: SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Ted Hardie
draft-van-beijnum-multi-mtu-01.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Fwd: Africa and IPv6, rajesh rajesh
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Brian E Carpenter

Nov 19 2007

Nov 16 2007

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-cheshire-ipv4-acd-05.txt, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Africa and IPv6, philemon
Gen-ART review of draft-cheshire-ipv4-acd-05.txt, Spencer Dawkins
Gen-ART review of draft-evain-ebu-urn-01.txt, Black_David
Re: Africa and IPv6, SM
Re: Africa and IPv6, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
SAFE BoF in Vancouver, Colin Perkins
Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, michael.dillon
Africa and IPv6, philemon
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Stephen Sprunk

Nov 15 2007

Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Sam Hartman
Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Sam Hartman
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Jari Arkko
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Tom.Petch
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, David Kessens
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Joe Touch
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Stephen Kent
Note on submitting non -00 drafts automatically, Philip Matthews
Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Noel Chiappa
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Marc Manthey
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Pekka Savola
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Rémi Després
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Jari Arkko
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, RJ Atkinson
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, RJ Atkinson
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Joe Touch
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Eliot Lear
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Steven M. Bellovin
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Spencer Dawkins
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Rémi Després
RE: terminology proposal: NAT+PT, Sheng Jiang
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Rémi Després
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, David Kessens
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Joe Touch
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Steven M. Bellovin
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Sam Hartman
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Joe Touch

Nov 14 2007

Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Steven M. Bellovin
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Joe Touch
RE: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Keith Moore
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Stephen Kent
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT, Keith Moore
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT, Stephen Sprunk
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: terminology proposal: NAT+PT (or NAT64 ?), Rémi Després
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Francis Dupont
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Lucy Lynch
RE: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Jari Arkko
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Joe Touch
Re: NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, Iljitsch van Beijnum
NAT+PT for IPv6 Transition & Operator Feedback generally, RJ Atkinson
terminology proposal: NAT+PT, RJ Atkinson
Reject the "experimental" TLS authorization proposal, Ben Caplan
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Greg Skinner
NAT-PT (Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt), Harald Alvestrand

Nov 13 2007

RE: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, michael.dillon
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Thomas Narten
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Eliot Lear
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Tom.Petch
Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Mohsen Souissi

Nov 12 2007

RE: New web-based submission tool, Janet P Gunn
Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Noel Chiappa
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Pars Mutaf
Re: New web-based submission tool, Tim Chown
Re: New web-based submission tool, Dave Crocker
RE: New web-based submission tool, Eric Gray
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Thomas Narten
FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
secdir review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-reqts-05.txt, Stephen Hanna
Re: [PSAMP] FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-protocol (Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocol Specifications) to Proposed Standard, Benoit Claise
RE: [Sipping] Last Call: draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples (Ses sion Initiation Protocol Service Examples) to BCP, Hutton, Andrew
RE: [Sipping] Last Call: draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples (SessionInitiation Protocol Service Examples) to BCP, Henry Sinnreich
New web-based submission tool, Tim Chown
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Alexey Melnikov

Nov 10 2007

November 75% OFF, VIAGRA � Official Site

Nov 08 2007

Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten

Nov 08 2007

Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt, Sam Hartman
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Sam Hartman
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Jari Arkko
RE: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema forMedia Control) to Informational RFC, Even, Roni
More Vancouver Hotels, Lyndon Nerenberg
Re: Hotels in YVR, Lyndon Nerenberg
Hotels in YVR, lconroy
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Bill Fenner

Nov 07 2007

Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Bernard Aboba
Re: I oppose making TLS-authz an experimental standard, Noel Chiappa
RE: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: I oppose making TLS-authz an experimental standard, Byung-Hee HWANG
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, SM
RE: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema for Media Control) to Informational RFC, Hollenbeck, Scott
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Henrik Levkowetz
I oppose making TLS-authz an experimental standard, Franky Almonte
Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp-05.txt, JP Vasseur
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Cullen Jennings
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, michael.dillon
Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Dave Crocker
IETF Liaison to ITU-NGN, Joe Abley
Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Theodore Tso
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Thomas Narten
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Eric Gray
RE: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), michael.dillon
Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Henrik Levkowetz
RE: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), michael.dillon
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Stephen Farrell
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen
Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Jari Arkko
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, michael.dillon
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen
Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt, John C Klensin
Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt, Spencer Dawkins
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, SM

Nov 06 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Jari Arkko
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: Re:I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Jari Arkko
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Last Call: draft-goodwin-iso-urn (A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)) to Informational RFC, Frank Ellermann
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Bill Fenner
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Michelle Cotton
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Jari Arkko
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Ted Hardie
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Russ Housley
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Bernard Aboba
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Lars Eggert
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Stephane Bortzmeyer
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, michael.dillon
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Stephane Bortzmeyer
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Jari Arkko
Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Norbert Bollow
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Jari Arkko
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Lars Eggert
Re: Last Call: draft-korhonen-mip6-service (Service Selection for Mobile IPv6) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Brian E Carpenter

Nov 05 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Frank Ellermann
Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Keith Moore
Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Steven M. Bellovin
RE: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Lawrence Rosen
FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-sample-tech (Sampling and Filtering Techniques for IP Packet Selection) to Proposed Standard, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-protocol (Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocol Specifications) to Proposed Standard, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., John C Klensin
Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Nov 04 2007

Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Dave Crocker
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Eric Burger
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Eric Burger

Nov 03 2007

Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Dave Crocker
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Lyndon Nerenberg
Re: tools everywhere, Frank Ellermann
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, John C Klensin
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Dave Crocker
New IETF Journal available now, Mirjam Kuehne
Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Scott O. Bradner
Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Brian E Carpenter

Nov 02 2007

Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Lyndon Nerenberg
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, SM
tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Scott O. Bradner
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Joel M. Halpern
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Olafur Gudmundsson
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Brian E Carpenter
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: PerformanceMetrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Randy Presuhn
RE: 2026, draft, full, etc., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Bob Braden
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Joel M. Halpern
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, John C Klensin
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Bill Sommerfeld
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Ned Freed
Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen
Re: Please oppose patent-encumbered technologies, including draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Ben Finney
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Eliot Lear
Re: About referenced documents..., Tom Yu
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Opposing tls-authz-extns, Alessandro Forghieri
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Richard Stallman
Re: About referenced documents..., Chris Grigg
Re: Please oppose patent-encumbered technologies, including draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Ben Finney
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Alexander Terekhov
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Russ Nelson

Nov 01 2007

Re: Experimental track, Frank Ellermann
Re: Free? Software Foundation, Stefanos Harhalakis
ccamp-archive, want to become a porn star?, walker
Re: Experimental track, Brian E Carpenter
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], David R Oran
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Brian E Carpenter
Re: About referenced documents..., Brian E Carpenter
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Brian E Carpenter
Re: About referenced documents..., Randy Presuhn
Re: About referenced documents..., Tom Yu
Re: [saag] Minor addition to draft-williams-on-channel-binding; one week to respond, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Sam Hartman
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Scott Brim
RE: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: PerformanceMetrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Dan Schutzer
RE: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Experimental track (was: Non-participants), Frank Ellermann
Re: About referenced documents..., Frank Ellermann
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Simon Josefsson
Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Dan Riley
Re: About referenced documents..., Randy Presuhn
Re: About referenced documents..., Tom Yu
Re: About referenced documents..., Brian E Carpenter

Oct 31 2007

secdir review of draft-ietf-v6ops-scanning-implications-03, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: About referenced documents..., lconroy
Re: About referenced documents..., Andrew G. Malis
Re: About referenced documents..., Tom Yu
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-xcon-framework (A Framework for Centralized Conferencing) to Proposed Standard, SM
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Dr. JunIchiro 'Itojun' Hagino, Jun Murai
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-xcon-framework (A Framework for Centralized Conferencing) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Frank Ellermann
Re: Non-participants, Frank Ellermann
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: 2026, draft, full, etc., Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Oct 30 2007

Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Ned Freed
Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Ned Freed
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Brian E Carpenter
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., James M. Polk
Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, peter_blatherwick
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Dave Crocker
Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Andrew Newton
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: 2026, draft, full, etc., michael.dillon
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Yaakov Stein
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Yaakov Stein
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Eric Burger
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Dave Cridland
2026, draft, full, etc., Eliot Lear
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, michael.dillon
Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Simon Josefsson
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Ted Hardie
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Byung-Hee HWANG
Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics at Other Layers (pmol)], Yangwoo Ko
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Dave Crocker
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Peter Dambier

Oct 29 2007

Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Simon Josefsson
RE: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Eric Burger
Patents can be for good, not only evil, Eric Burger

Mail converted by MHonArc