IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Announcements Archive]

Nov 13 2007

Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Mohsen Souissi

Nov 12 2007

RE: New web-based submission tool, Janet P Gunn
Re: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Noel Chiappa
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Pars Mutaf
Re: New web-based submission tool, Tim Chown
Re: New web-based submission tool, Dave Crocker
RE: New web-based submission tool, Eric Gray
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, Thomas Narten
FW: I-D Action:draft-narten-ipv6-statement-00.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
secdir review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-reqts-05.txt, Stephen Hanna
Re: [PSAMP] FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-protocol (Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocol Specifications) to Proposed Standard, Benoit Claise
RE: [Sipping] Last Call: draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples (Ses sion Initiation Protocol Service Examples) to BCP, Hutton, Andrew
RE: [Sipping] Last Call: draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples (SessionInitiation Protocol Service Examples) to BCP, Henry Sinnreich
New web-based submission tool, Tim Chown
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Alexey Melnikov

Nov 10 2007

November 75% OFF, VIAGRA Ž Official Site

Nov 08 2007

Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten

Nov 08 2007

Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt, Sam Hartman
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Sam Hartman
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Jari Arkko
RE: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema forMedia Control) to Informational RFC, Even, Roni
More Vancouver Hotels, Lyndon Nerenberg
Re: Hotels in YVR, Lyndon Nerenberg
Hotels in YVR, lconroy
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Bill Fenner

Nov 07 2007

Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Bernard Aboba
Re: I oppose making TLS-authz an experimental standard, Noel Chiappa
RE: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: I oppose making TLS-authz an experimental standard, Byung-Hee HWANG
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, SM
RE: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema for Media Control) to Informational RFC, Hollenbeck, Scott
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Henrik Levkowetz
I oppose making TLS-authz an experimental standard, Franky Almonte
Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp-05.txt, JP Vasseur
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Cullen Jennings
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, michael.dillon
Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Dave Crocker
IETF Liaison to ITU-NGN, Joe Abley
Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Theodore Tso
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Thomas Narten
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Eric Gray
RE: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), michael.dillon
Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Henrik Levkowetz
RE: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), michael.dillon
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Stephen Farrell
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen
Putting requirements on volunteer tool developers (Was: Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched), Jari Arkko
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, michael.dillon
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen
Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt, John C Klensin
Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-klensin-unicode-escapes-06.txt, Spencer Dawkins
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, SM

Nov 06 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Jari Arkko
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: Re:I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Jari Arkko
Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Re: I-DAction:draft-saintandre-header-pres-00.txt, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Last Call: draft-goodwin-iso-urn (A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)) to Informational RFC, Frank Ellermann
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Bill Fenner
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Michelle Cotton
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Jari Arkko
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Ted Hardie
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Russ Housley
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Bernard Aboba
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Lars Eggert
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Stephane Bortzmeyer
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, michael.dillon
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Stephane Bortzmeyer
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Jari Arkko
Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Norbert Bollow
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Jari Arkko
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Lars Eggert
Re: Last Call: draft-korhonen-mip6-service (Service Selection for Mobile IPv6) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Brian E Carpenter

Nov 05 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP, Frank Ellermann
Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Keith Moore
Re: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Steven M. Bellovin
RE: Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Lawrence Rosen
FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-sample-tech (Sampling and Filtering Techniques for IP Packet Selection) to Proposed Standard, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-protocol (Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocol Specifications) to Proposed Standard, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., John C Klensin
Reminder: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Nov 04 2007

Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Dave Crocker
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Eric Burger
RE: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Eric Burger

Nov 03 2007

Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Dave Crocker
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Lyndon Nerenberg
Re: tools everywhere, Frank Ellermann
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, John C Klensin
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Dave Crocker
New IETF Journal available now, Mirjam Kuehne
Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Scott O. Bradner
Re: tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Brian E Carpenter

Nov 02 2007

Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Lyndon Nerenberg
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, SM
tools everywhere (was Daily Dose version 2 launched, Scott O. Bradner
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Joel M. Halpern
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Olafur Gudmundsson
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Brian E Carpenter
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: PerformanceMetrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Randy Presuhn
RE: 2026, draft, full, etc., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Bob Braden
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, Joel M. Halpern
Re: Daily Dose version 2 launched, John C Klensin
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Bill Sommerfeld
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Ned Freed
Daily Dose version 2 launched, Pasi.Eronen
Re: Please oppose patent-encumbered technologies, including draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Ben Finney
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Eliot Lear
Re: About referenced documents..., Tom Yu
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Opposing tls-authz-extns, Alessandro Forghieri
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Richard Stallman
Re: About referenced documents..., Chris Grigg
Re: Please oppose patent-encumbered technologies, including draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Ben Finney
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Alexander Terekhov
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Russ Nelson

Nov 01 2007

Re: Experimental track, Frank Ellermann
Re: Free? Software Foundation, Stefanos Harhalakis
ccamp-archive, want to become a porn star?, walker
Re: Experimental track, Brian E Carpenter
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], David R Oran
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Brian E Carpenter
Re: About referenced documents..., Brian E Carpenter
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Brian E Carpenter
Re: About referenced documents..., Randy Presuhn
Re: About referenced documents..., Tom Yu
Re: [saag] Minor addition to draft-williams-on-channel-binding; one week to respond, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Sam Hartman
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Scott Brim
RE: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: PerformanceMetrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Dan Schutzer
RE: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Experimental track (was: Non-participants), Frank Ellermann
Re: About referenced documents..., Frank Ellermann
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Simon Josefsson
Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Dan Riley
Re: About referenced documents..., Randy Presuhn
Re: About referenced documents..., Tom Yu
Re: About referenced documents..., Brian E Carpenter

Oct 31 2007

secdir review of draft-ietf-v6ops-scanning-implications-03, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: About referenced documents..., lconroy
Re: About referenced documents..., Andrew G. Malis
Re: About referenced documents..., Tom Yu
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-xcon-framework (A Framework for Centralized Conferencing) to Proposed Standard, SM
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Dr. JunIchiro 'Itojun' Hagino, Jun Murai
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-xcon-framework (A Framework for Centralized Conferencing) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Frank Ellermann
Re: Non-participants, Frank Ellermann
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: 2026, draft, full, etc., Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Oct 30 2007

Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Ned Freed
Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Ned Freed
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Brian E Carpenter
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., James M. Polk
Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, peter_blatherwick
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Dave Crocker
Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Andrew Newton
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: 2026, draft, full, etc., michael.dillon
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Yaakov Stein
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Yaakov Stein
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Eric Burger
Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Dave Cridland
2026, draft, full, etc., Eliot Lear
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, michael.dillon
Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Simon Josefsson
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Ted Hardie
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Byung-Hee HWANG
Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics at Other Layers (pmol)], Yangwoo Ko
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Dave Crocker
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Peter Dambier

Oct 29 2007

Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Simon Josefsson
RE: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Eric Burger
Patents can be for good, not only evil, Eric Burger
Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Brian E Carpenter
Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics at Other Layers (pmol)], Sam Hartman
A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics at Other Layers (pmol)], Leslie Daigle
Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Keith Moore
Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Henning Schulzrinne
RE: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Lawrence Rosen
Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Bob Braden
Re: Nominet position paper about Signing the Root., Thierry Moreau
Nominet position paper about Signing the Root., Roy Arends
Minor addition to draft-williams-on-channel-binding; one week to respond, Sam Hartman
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Sam Hartman
RE: Silly TLS Auth lobbying, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Bill Sommerfeld
Re: rejection of patents and standards, Eric Burger
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Eric Rosen
Re: Free? Software Foundation, Scott O. Bradner
Re: Silly TLS Auth lobbying, Simon Josefsson
Re: Free? Software Foundation, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Noel Chiappa
Re: Free? Software Foundation, Scott O. Bradner
Re: Free? Software Foundation, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Free? Software Foundation, Scott O. Bradner
Re: Silly TLS Auth lobbying, Sam Hartman
Re: Please oppose patent-encumbered technologies, including draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Sam Hartman
RE: Silly TLS Auth lobbying, michael.dillon
Re: Silly TLS Auth lobbying, Masataka Ohta
Silly TLS Auth lobbying, RJ Atkinson
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Ben Finney
Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vorbis-06, Luca Barbato
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Ben Finney
Please oppose patent-encumbered technologies, including draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Ben Finney
Re: About referenced documents..., Randy Presuhn
About referenced documents..., lconroy

Oct 28 2007

Re: Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting, Marc Manthey
Re: Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting, Dave Crocker
Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Brian E Carpenter
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Bill Fenner
RE: Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting, Gordon.Lennox
RE: Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting, Ole Jacobsen
RE: Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting, David B. Nelson
Re: Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting, Dave Crocker

Oct 27 2007

Musical commentary from the RIPE meeting, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Bill Manning
Re: Please reject proprietary standards., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Brian E Carpenter
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Rob Evans
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Andrew Newton
RE: A pattented standard is not a standard, Byung-Hee HWANG
RE: A pattented standard is not a standard, Byung-Hee HWANG
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, David Morris
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Andrew Newton
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Andrew Newton
Re: DOS, Frank Ellermann
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Noel Chiappa
Re: Megatron, Frank Ellermann
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, James Seng
RE: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, David Harrington
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Ben Finney
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Stjepan Gros
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, David Morris
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Ben Finney
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Ben Finney
Re: Megatron, Harald Alvestrand
RE: DOS (was: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Bernard Aboba
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Bernard Aboba
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Brian Dickson
Re: A priori IPR choices, Brian E Carpenter

Oct 26 2007

Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Brian E Carpenter
Re: A pattented standard is not a standard, Bill Fenner
Re: Megatron, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Bernard Aboba
DOS (was: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz), Frank Ellermann
Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vorbis-06, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Noel Chiappa
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Ned Freed
RE: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Scott Kitterman
Megatron (was: TLS-authz), Frank Ellermann
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Brian E Carpenter
Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Joel M. Halpern
Re: A priori IPR choices, SM
RE: A pattented standard is not a standard, Scott Brim
RE: A pattented standard is not a standard, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: A priori IPR choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Powers Chuck-RXCP20
Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Melinda Shore
Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Randy Presuhn
RE: A priori IPR choices, Scott Brim
Call for IAOC Nominations and Volunteers, The IESG
RE: A priori IPR choices, Philippe Verdy
TLS-authz "experimental" standard, Christoph Resch
Opposition to accepting TLS-authz an experimental standard, Richard Hartmann
We oppose TLS-authz "experimental" standard, Reinhard Moosauer
I oppose making TLS-authz an experimental standard, Sven Lilienthal
Re: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation, Mark Smith
TLS-authz "experimental" standard, Richard Wilbur
Please reject proprietary standards., Ismael Jones
A pattented standard is not a standard, J. Pablo Fernández
TLS Authorization, Bryan Quigley
TLS Authorisation, Willy Weisz
TLS Auth, Eike Lange
Concerns on TLS authorization extensions, John Wyatt
Experimental TLS Authorization Standard, Craig, David
Comment on TLS authorization, Bernhard Damberger
TLS Authorization, Ringo Kamens
TLS Authorization Extensions, Matthew Flaschen
Re: Please reject draft-housley-tls-authz-extns (supplementary note), Toni Mueller
Please reject draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Toni Mueller
RE: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema for Media Control) to Informational RFC, Even, Roni
Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes (ASCII Escaping ofUnicode Characters) to BCP, Peter Constable
I oppose the publication of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns as an experimental standard., Michel Debar
Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls-02.txt, Bob Briscoe
TLS-authz standardization, Jan.Haul
Opposing making TLS-authz an experimental standard, Darko Ivancan
FIfF opposes making TLS-authz an experimental standard, Jakob Schröter
draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Andreas Huennebeck
comment opposing TLS-authz "experimental", Diez B. Roggisch
patented standards that go along with TLS-authz, Walter Bender
FSF opposes making TLS-authz an experimental standard, John Sullivan
please REJECT tls-authz until it is patent-free!, Chris MacGregor
We oppose TLS-authz., Jo
TLS-authz, Benj. Mako Hill
opposing TLS-authz "experimental", Bruno Delcourt
NO to TLS-authz, Chuck Burgess
TLS-authz, Joshua N Pritikin
Re: A priori IPR choices, Spencer Dawkins
RE: A priori IPR choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: A priori IPR choices, Norbert Bollow
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Byung-Hee HWANG
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Byung-Hee HWANG
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten

Oct 25 2007

Re: A priori IPR choices, Brian E Carpenter
Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Keith Moore
Re: A priori IPR choices, Theodore Tso
Re: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Ted Hardie
Re: IETF 70 - meeting conflict - any way to juggle schedule to accommodate?, Jari Arkko
Re: A priori IPR choices, David Morris
Re: A priori IPR choices, Norbert Bollow
IETF 70 - meeting conflict - any way to juggle schedule to accommodate?, Brian Dickson
Re: A priori IPR choices, Theodore Tso
Re: A priori IPR choices, Ted Hardie
Re: A priori IPR choices, Scott Kitterman
Re: A priori IPR choices, Norbert Bollow
Re: A priori IPR choices, Theodore Tso
RE: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Lawrence Rosen
Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema for Media Control) to Informational RFC, Even, Roni
Re: A priori IPR choices, Simon Josefsson

Oct 24 2007

ccamp-archive sitting next to a hot blonde, quinn
RE: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Lawrence Rosen
Re: A priori IPR choices, Brian E Carpenter
Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: A priori IPR choices, Norbert Bollow
Re: A priori IPR choices, Norbert Bollow
RE: A priori IPR choices, Ted Hardie
RE: A priori IPR choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: A priori IPR choices, Scott Kitterman
RE: A priori IPR choices, Tony Finch
RE: FYI 28 (was: A priori IPR choices), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: A priori IPR choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: A priori IPR choices, Lawrence Rosen
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Ted Hardie
Re: A priori IPR choices, Ted Hardie
Re: A priori IPR choices, Scott Kitterman
Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Sam Hartman
Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Tony Finch
RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-framework (A Framework for Packet Selection and Reporting) to Informational RFC, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls-02.txt, Lars Eggert
Re: A priori IPR choices, Frank Ellermann
FYI 28 (was: A priori IPR choices), Frank Ellermann
Re: A priori IPR choices, Norbert Bollow
Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Simon Josefsson
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Theodore Tso
Re: A priori IPR choices, Lawrence Rosen
Re: A priori IPR choices, Scott Kitterman
Re: A priori IPR choices, Brian E Carpenter

Oct 23 2007

Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Sam Hartman
Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Sam Hartman
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Ted Hardie
Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Ted Hardie
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Sam Hartman
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Ted Hardie
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Ted Hardie
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Sam Hartman
When is using patented technology appropriate?, Sam Hartman
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Sam Hartman
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Lightening talks at the plenary, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: A priori IPR choices, Lawrence Rosen
Re: A priori IPR choices, Norbert Bollow
Re: A priori IPR choices, Theodore Tso
Re: A priori IPR choices, stephen . farrell
Re: A priori IPR choices, Simon Josefsson
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Sam Hartman
Re: A priori IPR choices, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Scott Brim
Re: A priori IPR choices, Frank Ellermann
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Simon Josefsson
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Norbert Bollow
Re: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: A priori IPR choices, Frank Ellermann
RE: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation, michael.dillon
Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-topologies-06.txt, Magnus Westerlund
Re: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation, David Conrad
Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls-02.txt, Tom Yu
Re: Seeking ICANN Nomcom 2008 candidate, Joe Abley
An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation, michael.dillon
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Brian E Carpenter
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Henning Schulzrinne
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Scott Kitterman

Oct 22 2007

Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-topologies-06.txt, Suresh Krishnan
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Sam Hartman
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], John C Klensin
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Lawrence Rosen
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Norbert Bollow
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], John C Klensin
Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John C Klensin
RE: Last Call: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes (ASCII Escaping ofUnicode Characters) to BCP, Peter Constable
Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Sam Hartman
Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes (ASCII Escaping ofUnicode Characters) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes (ASCII Escaping ofUnicode Characters) to BCP, Peter Constable
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], David Morris
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Oct 21 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes (ASCII Escaping ofUnicode Characters) to BCP, Frank Ellermann
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], David Harrington
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], David Harrington
Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-unicode-escapes (ASCII Escaping of Unicode Characters) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Lawrence Rosen

Oct 20 2007

Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Brian E Carpenter
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Joel M. Halpern

Oct 19 2007

RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Ted Hardie
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Lawrence Rosen
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Ted Hardie
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Ted Hardie
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Brian E Carpenter
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Lawrence Rosen
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Thomas Narten
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Ted Hardie
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Paul Hoffman
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Dave Crocker
Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Simon Josefsson
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls-02.txt, Tom Yu
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Paul Hoffman

Oct 18 2007

Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Brian E Carpenter
RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Lawrence Rosen
Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Eric Rescorla
A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Scott Brim
A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Brian E Carpenter
Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter
RE: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Russ Housley
Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Simon Josefsson
Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-rs-04.txt, Elwyn Davies

Oct 17 2007

review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfs-rdma-problem-statement-07.txt, Sandy Murphy
Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sip-answermode-06.txt, Suresh Krishnan
FW: ITU-T Recommendations, Yaakov Stein
Re: TMDA backscatter, Douglas Otis

Oct 16 2007

Host for IETF 73, Ray Pelletier
Re: RFC3678: header incompatibility, Bill Fenner
Re: [IPsec] Re: Last call comments for draft-lepinski-dh-groups-01, Chinh Nguyen
RE: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML Schema for Media Control) to Informational RFC, Even, Roni
Re: TMDA backscatter, Frank Ellermann
Re: RFC3678: header incompatibility, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct., Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC, Magnus Westerlund
Re: RFC3678: header incompatibility, Bill Fenner
Re: RFC3678: header incompatibility, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Vancouver Host & Sponsor Lineup!, Ray Pelletier
Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct., Douglas Otis
Re: RFC3678: header incompatibility, Bill Fenner
RFC3678: header incompatibility, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct., Brian E Carpenter

Oct 15 2007

Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct., Daniel Senie
Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct., Joel Jaeggli
RFP: IESG I-D Tracker Pythin Conversion, Ray Pelletier
Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct., Daniel Senie
Re: TMDA backscatter, Douglas Otis
Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct., John Leslie
The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct., Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Mail converted by MHonArc