IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Announcements Archive]

Jul 13 2007

Re: Autoreply, Keith Moore
Re: Autoreply, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Autoreply, Keith Moore
Re: Autoreply, John C Klensin
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Re: Autoreply, Ken Raeburn
Re: Autoreply, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Autoreply, Ken Raeburn
Re: Autoreply, Douglas Otis

Jul 12 2007

Working Group Last Call: syslog-sign-22, David Harrington
Re: Autoreply: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Ken Raeburn
Re: Autoreply: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Autoreply: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-reconnect-client (IMAP4 Extensions for Quick Mailbox Resynchronization) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
RE: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Jul 11 2007

Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Ned Freed
Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Suresh Krishnan
Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, John C Klensin
IAOC Scribes, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Douglas Otis
[Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-answermode (Requesting AnsweringModes for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, Steve Langstaff
Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Eric Burger
Re: Last Call: draft-carlberg-trip-attribute-rp (TRIP Attribute for Resource Priority) to Proposed Standard, ken carlberg
Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, John C Klensin
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Masataka Ohta
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Eliot Lear
Re: PKI is weakly secure, Masataka Ohta

Jul 10 2007

Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Douglas Otis
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-answermode (Requesting Answering Modes for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Stephen Kent
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Douglas Otis
RE: Updating the rules?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re:Domain Centric Administration), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Arnt Gulbrandsen
Re: Last Call: draft-carlberg-trip-attribute-rp (TRIP Attribute for Resource Priority) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie
RE: PKI is weakly secure, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Annoying auto-reply messages, Ole Jacobsen
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-hunt-avt-rtcpxnq (BT's eXtended Network Quality RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR XNQ)) to Informational RFC, jburguet
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-carlberg-trip-attribute-rp (TRIP Attribute for Resource Priority) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
Re: PKI is weakly secure, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: PKI is weakly secure, Stephen Kent
Re: Updating the rules?, Robert Sayre
Re: PKI is weakly secure, Masataka Ohta

Jul 09 2007

Re: Updating the rules?, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Stephen Kent
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Douglas Otis
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-rosenberg-sip-app-media-tag (A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Media Feature Tag for MIME Application Sub-Types) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-drage-sipping-service-identification (A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for the Identification of Services) to Informational RFC, jburguet
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Michael Tuexen
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Douglas Otis
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Lars Eggert
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Eliot Lear
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Masataka Ohta
Re: PKI is weakly secure, Sam Hartman

Jul 08 2007

Re: Updating the rules?, Sam Hartman
IETF Secretariat Services RFP Qs & As, Ray Pelletier
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Stephen Sprunk
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Mark Andrews

Jul 07 2007

Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Updating the rules?, Michael Thomas
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Keith Moore
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Masataka Ohta
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Eliot Lear
PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Masataka Ohta
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Updating the rules?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Updating the rules?, Keith Moore
Re: Last Call: draft-wilde-text-fragment (URI Fragment Identifiers for the text/plain Media Type) to Proposed Standard, Martin Duerst
Re: Updating the rules?, Robert Sayre
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis

Jul 06 2007

Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Nicolas Williams
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, John C Klensin
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: Updating the rules?, Douglas Otis
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Kurt Zeilenga
A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Terry Gray
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Jeffrey Altman
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Sam Hartman
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Simon Josefsson
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Jeffrey Altman
Draft ION about our rules in practice, Brian E Carpenter
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-acr-code (Rejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, jburguet

Jul 05 2007

Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Alexey Melnikov
Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, john . loughney
Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
RE: Putting technology on the table [Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Sam Hartman
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics, Dave Crocker
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Tom.Petch
Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Cullen Jennings
Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum
[no subject], ietf-bounces
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Suresh Krishnan
RE: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Black_David
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Marc Blanchet
Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Gonzalo Camarillo
Consideration of draft-lior-radius-attribute-type-extension-02.txt, Bernard Aboba
Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Tony Li
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Tony Li
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Tony Li
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Tony Li
Updating the rules?, Brian E Carpenter
Putting technology on the table [Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt], Brian E Carpenter
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Jul 04 2007

Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines (IPFIX Implementation Guidelines) to Informational RFC, jburguet
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Ole Jacobsen
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, John C Klensin
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Suresh Krishnan
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, michael.dillon
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Joe Baptista
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, John C Klensin
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Joe Baptista
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, michael.dillon
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, SM
RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Michel Py
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Stephen Sprunk

Jul 03 2007

Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis
RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Mailman request spam exploit, Douglas Otis
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Clint Chaplin
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
RE: Domain Centric Administration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Christian Huitema
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Douglas Otis
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Clint Chaplin
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Dave Crocker
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Joel Jaeggli
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Noel Chiappa
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Marshall Eubanks
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Noel Chiappa
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Arnt Gulbrandsen
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux (Multiplexing RTP Data and Control Packets on a Single Port) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Melinda Shore
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, michael.dillon
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Thierry Ernst
Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, SM
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Mark Andrews
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, David Conrad
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Ned Freed
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Mark Andrews
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, David Morris

Jul 02 2007

RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Mark Andrews
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Should not URIs be resources and not actions, Masataka Ohta
RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Should not URIs be resources and not actions, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: Should not URIs be resources and not actions, Eric Burger
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Douglas Otis
RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Noel Chiappa
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jeroen Massar
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, John C Klensin
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Elwyn Davies
RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Melinda Shore
RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Christian Huitema
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Melinda Shore
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-gruu (Obtaining and Using Globally Routable User Agent (UA) URIs (GRUU) in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Noel Chiappa
secdir review of draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-04.txt, Stephen Hanna
Re: IPv6 transition technologies, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: IPv6 transition technologies, Brian E Carpenter
draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: IPv6 transition technologies, Paul Hoffman
Re: IPv6 transition technologies, John C Klensin
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino

Jul 01 2007

Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Philip Matthews
Re: IPv6 transition technologies, Paul Hoffman
IPv6 transition technologies, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
バター犬, information
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jeroen Massar
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Paul Hoffman
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Michel Py
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Fred Baker
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Noel Chiappa
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Bob Hinden

Jun 30 2007

What about the SMS URI?, Daniel Aleksandersen
Should not URIs be resources and not actions, Daniel Aleksandersen

Jun 29 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC, Douglas Otis
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-srp (Using SRP for TLS Authentication) to Informational RFC, jburguet
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC, Douglas Otis

Jun 28 2007

Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Ralph Droms
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Michael Thomas
Re: IESG workload problem (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? ), Joe Touch
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter
IESG workload problem (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? ), Harald Alvestrand

Jun 27 2007

Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Michael Thomas
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Keith Moore
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Keith Moore
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter

Jun 26 2007

Has anyone looked at the DISCUSS Criteria document lately? (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)), Spencer Dawkins

Jun 25 2007

Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Randall Gellens

Jun 24 2007

Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jim Martin
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch
RE: Ietf Digest, Vol 38, Issue 40... Content of IETF digest., Mohammed Shahnawaz

Jun 22 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Chris Newman

Jun 22 2007

Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin
Udaya V Kumar is out of the office., Udaya V Kumar
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC, jburguet
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten

Jun 21 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Dave Crocker
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin

Jun 20 2007

Raimond, Raimond ZWEDUKS
Anina, Anina GONNIRICH
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John C Klensin

Jun 19 2007

Re: ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78), Brian E Carpenter
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch
ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78), Dave Cridland
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-split, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Clint Chaplin
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Cullen Jennings
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Joel M. Halpern

Jun 18 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Joel M. Halpern
Re: On Experts [Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)], Michael Thomas
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Henning Schulzrinne
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba
RE: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Black_David
Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Gonzalo Camarillo
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joel M. Halpern
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland
Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Brian E Carpenter
On Experts [Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)], Brian E Carpenter
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti

Jun 17 2007

{LET:Profitieren mit Kronos, Info zum Profitieren, Gewinn mit Filmunternehmen erzielen, Investieren mit Zukunft, Sie suchen nach Gewinnchancen?, Informationsvorsprung, Kronos sensationell guenstig, Kurz vom neuen Ausbruch, Massives Umsatzpotenzial, Potent, Landris Gonzalez
IANA considerations concerns -- specific cases?, Jari Arkko
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin
Re: [XCON] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Eric Rescorla
RE: [XCON] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Brian Rosen
Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Harald Alvestrand
{LET:Profitieren mit Kronos, Info zum Profitieren, Gewinn mit Filmunternehmen erzielen, Investieren mit Zukunft, Sie suchen nach Gewinnchancen?, Informationsvorsprung, Kronos sensationell guenstig, Kurz vom neuen Ausbruch, Massives Umsatzpotenzial, Potent, Lilianne Herzog
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof forChicago), Romascanu, Dan (Dan)

Jun 15 2007

draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-21.txt: section 3 contains new text to address ietf last call comments, Sam Hartman
Re: Type I vs. Type II errors, Keith Moore
Re: Type I vs. Type II errors, Keith Moore
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Michael Thomas
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Paul Hoffman
Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Paul Hoffman
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Ted Hardie
{LET:Kronos Aktien steigen, Profitieren mit Kronos, Schlau Geld investieren durch erste Information, Info zum Profitieren, Kurz vom neuen Ausbruch, Massives Umsatzpotenzial, Potential weit nach oben vorhanden, Investieren in die Zukunft, Naechste Explosio, Kesara Gantert
Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Sam Hartman
RE: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Robert Elz
Role of IANA in approving assignments, Thomas Narten
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Thomas Narten
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Robert Elz
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Investieren mit Zukunft, KALPESH Hayles
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Jari Arkko
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Pasi.Eronen
RE: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Pasi.Eronen
Re: Type I vs. Type II errors, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Harald Alvestrand
{LET:Kronos Aktien steigen, Profitieren mit Kronos, Schlau Geld investieren durch erste Information, Info zum Profitieren, Gewinn mit Filmunternehmen erzielen, Investieren mit Zukunft, Aktie zieht stark an, Potential weit nach oben vorhanden, Investitions, Kavita HAMILTON
Away until June-18: [L2TPEXT Milestones past due], Carlos Pignataro
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Thomas Narten
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Thomas Narten

Jun 14 2007

Re: Questions on my role as the 2007-8 nomcom chair and the various discussions on the IETF list, Stephen Kent
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie
RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: IANA registration constraints, Bob Braden
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawingsponsorship...), michael.dillon
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawingsponsorship...), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Paul Hoffman
Kronos sensationell guenstig, Johnie Mae GOLDSTEIN
Re: IANA registration constraints, Brian E Carpenter
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Pasi.Eronen
Fuer den aktiven und erfolgsorientierten Anleger!, Jakob Gautchier
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin

Jun 13 2007

Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Joel Jaeggli
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), John C Klensin
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Tony Finch
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Arnt Gulbrandsen
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Bob Braden
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jeroen Massar
Re: Un-expiring procedural documents, Brian E Carpenter
chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba
RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsec-filter-caps (Filtering and Rate Limiting Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure) to BCP, Chris L. Morrow
Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Rajeev Koodli
NDN: [IPFIX] Last Call: draft-ietf-ipfix-biflow (Bidirectional Flow Export using, Post Office
RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsec-filter-caps (Filtering and Rate Limiting Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure) to BCP, Barry Greene \(bgreene\)
Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Rajeev Koodli
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), John C Klensin
RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Paul Hoffman
RE: IANA registration constraints, Paul Hoffman
Re: IANA registration constraints, Ralph Droms
Un-expiring procedural documents, Paul Hoffman
RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: IANA registration constraints, Jari Arkko
Re: IANA considerations and IETF Consensus, Jari Arkko
RE: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Jari Arkko
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Jari Arkko
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Pasi.Eronen
Re: Questions on my role as the 2007-8 nomcom chair and the various discussions on the IETF list, Eliot Lear
Questions on my role as the 2007-8 nomcom chair and the various discussions on the IETF list, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joel M. Halpern

Jun 12 2007

Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Ted Hardie
Beware of fake pills, Francisco Perry
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status?, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Russ Housley
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Sam Hartman
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Melinda Shore
Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: IANA considerations and IETF Consensus, Paul Hoffman
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Sam Hartman
Type I vs. Type II errors, Dave Crocker
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Thomas Narten
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John C Klensin
Re: IANA registration constraints, Dave Crocker
Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), John C Klensin
IANA considerations and IETF Consensus, Paul Hoffman
IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Dave Crocker
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John C Klensin
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Dave Crocker
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Tony Finch
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Dave Crocker
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Eliot Lear
RE: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Pasi.Eronen
Re: [Mip4] AW: [tsv-dir] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Jari Arkko
AW: [tsv-dir] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Tschofenig, Hannes
Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Sam Hartman

Jun 11 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dccp-rtp (RTP and the DatagramCongestion Control Protocol (DCCP)) to Proposed Standard, Colin Perkins
Investitionen in Telekommunikationsmarkt, Kasy Hibma
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch

Jun 10 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Ned Freed
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, william(at)elan.net
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin
Avoid enhancement pills, David Diaz
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Dave Crocker
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Dave Crocker

Jun 09 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John Levine

Jun 08 2007

Last Call: draft-ietf-dccp-rtp (RTP and the DatagramCongestion Control Protocol (DCCP)) to Proposed Standard, Dan Wing
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Stephane Bortzmeyer

Jun 07 2007

tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Tschofenig, Hannes

Jun 06 2007

Jun 05 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC, Suresh Krishnan
Calendar Adopted with Provisional Regions 2011 - 2013, Ray Pelletier
Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard), Julian Reschke
RE: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC, Narayanan, Vidya

Jun 04 2007

Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call, Lisa Dusseault
Re: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted), Mike Leber
Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (SpecifyingNewCongestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, Erblichs

Jun 02 2007

Re: consensus and anonymity, Brian E Carpenter

Jun 01 2007

Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas

Jun 01 2007

Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas
Re: consensus and anonymity, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas
SeND & CGA Extensions BOF, marcelo bagnulo braun
Re: consensus and anonymity, Andy Bierman
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Re: consensus and anonymity, Spencer Dawkins
Re: consensus and anonymity, Brian E Carpenter
Re: On the IETF Consensus process, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: consensus and anonymity, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: consensus and anonymity, Henning Schulzrinne
Re: consensus and anonymity, Joel M. Halpern
Re: consensus and anonymity, Andy Bierman

May 31 2007

Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas
Re: consensus and anonymity, Andy Bierman
Re: consensus and anonymity, Sam Hartman
Re: consensus and anonymity, Sam Hartman
Re: consensus and anonymity, Andy Bierman
Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas
Re: consensus and anonymity, Spencer Dawkins
Re: consensus and anonymity, Andy Bierman
Re: consensus and anonymity, John C Klensin
Re: consensus and anonymity, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: consensus and anonymity, Scott O. Bradner
Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas
Re: consensus and anonymity, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: consensus and anonymity, Spencer Dawkins
Re: consensus and anonymity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: consensus and anonymity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: consensus and anonymity, Spencer Dawkins
Re: consensus and anonymity, Melinda Shore
RE: [Hipsec] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-applications (Using the HostIdentity Protocol with Legacy Applications) to Experimental RFC, Henderson, Thomas R
Re: consensus and anonymity, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: consensus and anonymity, Melinda Shore
Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (SpecifyingNewCongestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, Mark Allman
Re: consensus and anonymity, John C Klensin
RE: On the IETF Consensus process, John C Klensin
consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas
cheap oem soft shipping //orldwide, Mason Campbell
RE: On the IETF Consensus process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Putting IPR on the IETF consensus proccess (was: beware of fake pills), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted), Jeroen Massar
Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying NewCongestion Control Algorithms) to BCP, Mark Allman
Re: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted), bmanning

May 30 2007

RE: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted), James Jun

Mail converted by MHonArc