IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]

Mar 11 2009

Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Dean Willis
Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Ralf Weber
Does being an RFC mean anything?, Joe Baptista

Mar 11 2009

Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, TSG
Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, James Aldridge
Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Melinda Shore
Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Michael Loftis
Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Ofer Inbar
Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Joe Abley
Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Dave CROCKER
Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Spencer Dawkins
Does being an RFC mean anything?, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eliot Lear
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Cullen Jennings
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, ned+ietf
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga
Re: [Ietf-honest] Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eric Rescorla
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, SM
RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Dave Cridland
RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Alessandro Vesely
SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-11, Richard Barnes
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Peter Saint-Andre
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Theodore Tso
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, ned+ietf

Mar 10 2009

Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eran Hammer-Lahav
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Kurt Zeilenga
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Dean Willis
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Paul Hoffman
"Unresolved" patent issues [Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz], Brian E Carpenter
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, SM
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Paul Hoffman
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Lawrence Rosen
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Stephan Wenger
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-09, Neil Cook
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-09, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-09, Dave Cridland
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-09, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Mar 09 2009

Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-09, Neil Cook
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Stephan Wenger
Reminder: Tools codesprint at IETF74, Robert Sparks
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, SM
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, SM
Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Andrew Sullivan
Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Danny Mayer
RE: jim bound, Templin, Fred L
Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie
Re: Early implementers motivations [was Re: Running Code], Alexandru Petrescu
Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Florian Weimer
Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Ask Bjørn Hansen
Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Danny Mayer

Mar 08 2009

Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Running Code, ned+ietf
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, John C Klensin
Re: Passing of Jim Bound, Jeffrey I. Schiller
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Olafur Gudmundsson
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, David Conrad
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Christian Huitema
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, ned+ietf
Re: Passing of Jim Bound, Robert Moskowitz
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Running Code, ned+ietf

Mar 07 2009

Re: Running Code, Cullen Jennings
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Cullen Jennings
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Cullen Jennings
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, David Morris
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: Running Code, Doug Ewell
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman
Re: jim bound, Michael Loftis
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Julian Reschke
jim bound, Paul Vixie
Re: Running Code, Scott Lawrence
A proposal of global disussion about communication protocols, for accelerating democratic activities including discussing economic policy, election and voting, Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI
RE: Abstract on Page 1?, Scott Lawrence
Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Doug Otis
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Simon Josefsson
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-roll-indus-routing-reqs (Industrial Routing Requirements in Low Power and Lossy Networks) to Informational RFC, Alexandru Petrescu
Re: [Roll] Last Call: draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs (Building Automation Routing Requirements in Low Power and Lossy Networks) to Informational RFC, Alexandru Petrescu
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga

Mar 06 2009

RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, John C Klensin
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Sam Hartman
RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, John C Klensin
Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-09, Spencer Dawkins
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eric Rescorla
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eric Rescorla
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eric Rescorla
IAOC/IAD Office Hours at IETF 74 in San Francisco, Ray Pelletier
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga
Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Tim Polk
Re: [IAB] SAVI/SHARA/BEHAVE/AUTOCONF/LISP conflicts (Was: Re: 74th IETF - Agenda), Lixia Zhang
Re: Early implementers motivations [was Re: Running Code], ned+ietf
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten

Mar 05 2009

RE: Abstract on Page 1?, John C Klensin
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie
Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Andrew Sullivan
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Dave CROCKER
RE: Abstract on Page 1?, Paul Hoffman
Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Doug Otis
RE: Abstract on Page 1?, John C Klensin
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie
Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Andrew Sullivan
Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Dave Cridland
RE: Abstract on Page 1?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Early implementers motivations [was Re: Running Code], Doug Ewell
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Doug Ewell
Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Jeroen Massar
Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Tim Chown
Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tim Chown
Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Jari Arkko
Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Florian Weimer
Re: IETF speed -- was Re: Running Code, Lars Eggert
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Olaf Kolkman
RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Running Code, Henning Schulzrinne

Mar 04 2009

Re: Running Code, Pete Resnick
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Scott Kitterman
RE: Passing of Jim Bound, Russ Housley
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, TSG
Early implementers motivations [was Re: Running Code], Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Mark Andrews
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch
Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch
Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Elwyn Davies
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, OndÅej SurÃ
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, bmanning
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Chris Thompson
Re: Running Code, ned+ietf
Re: Running Code, ned+ietf
RE: Running Code, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: Running Code, Melinda Shore
IANA "Office Hours" at IETF-74 in San Francisco, Michelle Cotton
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Dean Willis
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Livingood, Jason
Re: Running Code, Melinda Shore
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, OndÅej SurÃ
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Rémi Després
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Florian Weimer
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Florian Weimer
Re: Running Code, Henning Schulzrinne
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Paul Hoffman
RE: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Christian Huitema
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch
Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Margaret Wasserman
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Nicholas Weaver
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, ned+ietf
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, OndÅej SurÃ
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Andrew Sullivan
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Julian Reschke
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Marshall Eubanks
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Melinda Shore
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Tim Bray
Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Stewart Bryant
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch
Abstract on Page 1?, Margaret Wasserman
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie
Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch
Re: Running Code, Andy Bierman
Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Andrew Sullivan
RE: Running Code, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: Running Code, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Running Code, ned+ietf
Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Florian Weimer
Re: Running Code, Andrew Sullivan
IETF speed -- was Re: Running Code, Alfred Hönes
RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch
Re: Running Code, Jari Arkko
Re: Running Code, Lars Eggert
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Arnt Gulbrandsen
RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Re: Running Code, Alessandro Vesely
RE: Running Code, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Lynn St . Amour
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Running Code, Masataka Ohta
Re: Running Code, ned+ietf
Re: Running Code, Andy Bierman
Re: Running Code, Gary E. Miller
Re: Running Code, Masataka Ohta
RE: Running Code, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Running Code, Henry Sinnreich
Re: Running Code, Henning Schulzrinne
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Mark Andrews
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, John C Klensin

Mar 03 2009

Re: Running Code, Harald Alvestrand
Stepping back a bit Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Leslie Daigle
Re: Passing of Jim Bound, Philip Nesser
Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Running Code, Peter Saint-Andre
Passing of Jim Bound, Russ Housley
Re: Running Code, Brian E Carpenter
Repair of Public Mail List Archives Complete, Alexa Morris
Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Mark Andrews
Tools to Publish I-Ds with pre-5378 Content, Ray Pelletier
RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf
RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Tex Texin
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Arnt Gulbrandsen
RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Dean Willis
Re: ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization), Brian E Carpenter
Re: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Randy Presuhn
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, SM

Mar 02 2009

Last Call: draft-ietf-avt-seed-srtp (The SEED Cipher Algorithm and Its Use with the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)) to Proposed Standard, The IESG
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Dave CROCKER
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Alexa Morris
RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Paul Hoffman
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Joel Jaeggli
RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Samuel Weiler
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, John C Klensin
Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred valuefor YU, Randy Presuhn
RE: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Phillips, Addison
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, SM
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, SM
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Douglas Otis
Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Richard Barnes
RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Olaf Kolkman
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, JFC Morfin
New IETF Journal available now (Volume 4, Issue 3), Mirjam Kuehne
Identity Services Beyond Web SSO (was RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07), Josh Howlett
Terminal room at IETF74, Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Tex Texin
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Patrik Fältström
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, SM
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, John C Klensin
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Eric Rescorla

Mar 01 2009

Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Lynn St.Amour
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Dave CROCKER
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, James M. Polk
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Lucy Lynch
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Patrik Fältström
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Dave CROCKER
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Patrik Fältström
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Dave CROCKER
RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Lucy Lynch
RE: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF, Dave Nelson
Re: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF, Alessandro Vesely
Re: ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization), George Michaelson
ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization), Jaap Akkerhuis

Feb 28 2009

Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS
Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF, Carsten Bormann
Re: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF, TSG
Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: Question about the meaning of the following boilerplate statement..., TSG
Question about the meaning of the following boilerplate statement..., TSG
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Alessandro Vesely
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Douglas Otis
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin

Feb 27 2009

Re: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF, TSG
draft-p2pi-cooper-workshop-report, Vijay K. Gurbani
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Alessandro Vesely
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Tony Hansen
Re: Withdraw of [rt.amsl.com #13277]: Authentication-Results Header Field Appeal, Douglas Otis
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Douglas Otis
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Eric Burger
Re: Some WG Mail Lists Archiving Incorrectly, Alexa Morris
Some WG Mail Lists Archiving Incorrectly, Alexa Morris

Feb 26 2009

Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf
Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard], Hector Santos
RE: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Initial Version I-D Submission Deadline Extended to March 4, 2009, Alexa Morris
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Alessandro Vesely
Query regarding V2 Profile Classification (Profile 0x104), Chaitanya Pradeep
Re: Withdraw of [rt.amsl.com #13277]: Authentication-Results Header Field Appeal, Harald Alvestrand
Re: Withdraw of [rt.amsl.com #13277]: Authentication-Results Header Field Appeal, Murray S. Kucherawy

Feb 25 2009

Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Douglas Otis
Re: [xml2rfc] Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY, Julian Reschke
Withdraw of [rt.amsl.com #13277]: Authentication-Results Header Field Appeal, Douglas Otis
ISOC BOT nominees, IAB Chair
Re: [xml2rfc] Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, David Morris
Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Cullen Jennings

Feb 24 2009

Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John Sullivan
Re: [Trustees] [xml2rfc] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Bob Hinden
Re: Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY, Julian Reschke
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Alessandro Vesely
Re: [xml2rfc] [IAB] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, ned+ietf

Feb 23 2009

Re: Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY, SM
Several ways you can publish I-Ds with pre 5378 content - TODAY, Cullen Jennings
Re: [xml2rfc] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Bill Fenner
Re: [IAB] [xml2rfc] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, John C Klensin
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Doug Otis
Re: [xml2rfc] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Bill Fenner
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Murray S. Kucherawy
Version of xml2rfc to produce drafts with new pre5378 IPR clause, Cullen Jennings

Feb 22 2009

Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Doug Otis
Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Ray Pelletier
Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Byung-Hee HWANG
Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Julian Reschke
Re: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Fernando Gont

Feb 21 2009

Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Fernando Gont
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Douglas Otis
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Stephen Kent
unsubscribe me from the ie mailing list, upendra bhanja
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, SM
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Dave CROCKER
RE: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Stephen Kent

Feb 20 2009

Re: appeal-otis-2009-02-16, J.D. Falk
Re: [IAB] IASA irresponsibility? (was: Re: [Trustees] LastCall for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem), John C Klensin
RE: IASA irresponsibility? (was: Re: [IAB] [Trustees] LastCall for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem), Ed Juskevicius
IASA irresponsibility? (was: Re: [IAB] [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem), John C Klensin
Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Ray Pelletier
Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, John C Klensin
[no subject], Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [Trustees] Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Ray Pelletier
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, John Levine
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
RE: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Scott Kitterman
Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Dave CROCKER
Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, The IESG

Feb 19 2009

RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Stephan Wenger
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, ned+ietf
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, John Levine
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Steven M. Bellovin
RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Christian Huitema
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, TSG
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, TSG

Feb 18 2009

RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re:Referencesto Redphone's "patent"), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, John Levine
RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re:Referencesto Redphone's "patent"), Powers Chuck-RXCP20
RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: Referencesto Redphone's "patent"), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Michael Dillon
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, TSG
RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Paul Hoffman
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Ted Hardie
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Doug Ewell
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Theodore Tso
RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Theodore Tso
RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Noel Chiappa
RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Noel Chiappa
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Steven M. Bellovin

Feb 17 2009

Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Stephen Farrell
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Noel Chiappa
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, John Levine
Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), TSG
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Thierry Moreau
Settlement proposal - Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy, TSG
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Paul Hoffman
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Michael Dillon
RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Michael B. Einschlag
Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Paul Hoffman
Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Lawrence Rosen

Feb 16 2009

Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), Theodore Tso
Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), ned+ietf
RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), Paul Hoffman
Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), John Levine
Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Noel Chiappa
RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), Lawrence Rosen
Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], John Levine
Re: San Francisco IETF Code Sprint, IETF Chair
Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], David Morris
Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), Harald Alvestrand
Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Harald Alvestrand
Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Alessandro Vesely

Feb 14 2009

RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Josh Howlett
Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], John Levine
RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Hannes Tschofenig
RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Brian E Carpenter
IPR advice to avoid ignorant flame wars about patents, Lawrence Rosen
Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), TSG
Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Jari Arkko
Re: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Lars Eggert
Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Keith Moore
Re: How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Michael Richardson
Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Joel Jaeggli
RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Contreras, Jorge
Re: Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Keith Moore
Re: How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Henning Schulzrinne

Feb 13 2009

RE: How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Brian E Carpenter
Fwd: Security Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Marshall Eubanks
Re: References to Redphone's "patent", Noel Chiappa
Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Tim Bray
Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], John C Klensin
RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Hallam-Baker, Phillip
How we got here, RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Lawrence Rosen
Re: References to Redphone's "patent", Scott Brim
RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Powers Chuck-RXCP20
Re: References to Redphone's "patent", Thomas Narten
Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Brian E Carpenter
Re: References to Redphone's "patent", Thierry Moreau
RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Ted Hardie
RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Noel Chiappa
RE: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem, Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Lawrence Rosen
RE: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, David Morris
Re: References to Redphone's "patent", Thierry Moreau
RE: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Ofer Inbar
RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Noel Chiappa
RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS
RE: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Powers Chuck-RXCP20
Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, ned+ietf
References to Redphone's "patent", Lawrence Rosen
RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Noel Chiappa
RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Kemp, David P.
RE: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], HUANG, ZHIHUI (JERRY), ATTLABS
Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Jari Arkko
Re: FSF's comment on draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Sam Hartman
Re: Please reject the patent-encumbered proposed standard for TLS authorization, Marshall Eubanks
Re: On the best use of IETF resources with respect to IPR, Simon Josefsson
Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate], Noel Chiappa
Re: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Melinda Shore
On the best use of IETF resources with respect to IPR, Paul Hoffman
(Re: IETF and open source license compatibility), Scott Kitterman
RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Kemp, David P.
Re: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt, Ivan Baldo
Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate, Rich Kulawiec
Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Scott O. Bradner
RE: TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07, Pasi.Eronen
Re: IETF and open source license compatibility, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: If you install Mail Filters how is the list integrity to be documented?, Peter Dambier
Re: Including the GPL in GPL code (Re: IETF and open source license compatibility), Simon Josefsson

Mail converted by MHonArc