IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Jun 15 2006
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in AdditiontoASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in AdditiontoASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Ted Faber
• RE: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Bill Fenner
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Joel M. Halpern
• RE: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in AdditiontoASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Lyndon Nerenberg
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in AdditiontoASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Ned Freed
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Additionto ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Randy Presuhn
• RE: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in AdditiontoASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in AdditiontoASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Additionto ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Joe Touch
• Re: IETF IPv6 platform configuration, Joe Touch
• RE: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Gray, Eric
• RE: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Additionto ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), nathaniel Borenstein
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Bill Fenner
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Thomas Narten
• RE: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Joel M. Halpern
• RE: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Additionto ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Yaakov Stein
• RE: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Additionto ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Yaakov Stein
• RE: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), ALABS
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), John R Levine
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12, Peter Dambier
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12, Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), John C Klensin
• Re: IETF IPv6 platform configuration, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), John L
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Joe Touch
• New mailing list for discussion of KEYPROV symmetric key provisioning proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Joe Touch
• Jun 14 2006
• Re: IETF IPv6 platform configuration, Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Bob Braden
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), John Levine
• Re: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats), Joel M. Halpern
• draft-ietf-simple-xcap-11, James G Smith
• Re: IETF, IAB, & RFC-Editor, IETF Secretariat
• Re: [Mobopts] BOF: Transport-Enhancing Refinements to the Network Layer Interface (TERNLI), Rajeev Koodli
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, bmanning
• Re: IETF, IAB, & RFC-Editor, RJ Atkinson
• [no subject], Eddie Arthurs
• Jun 13 2006
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Ted Faber
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Masataka Ohta
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Harald Alvestrand
• Jun 12 2006
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Ted Faber
• Re: IETF IPv6 platform configuration, Elwyn Davies
• Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), Pekka Savola
• Re: IETF IPv6 platform configuration, Pekka Savola
• Re: IETF IPv6 platform configuration, Kevin Loch
• Re: IETF IPv6 platform configuration, Sam Hartman
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), Ned Freed
• RE: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handl ing' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), Gray, Eric
• Re: Last Call Comments: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Clarification Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ash-alt-formats-02.txt, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [Int-area] BOF: Transport-Enhancing Refinements to the Network Layer Interface (TERNLI), Bernard Aboba
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Last Call: 'IETF Process and Operations Documentss' to Experimental RFC (draft-alvestrand-ipod), John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), John C Klensin
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Carsten Bormann
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Last Call Comments: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: 'IETF Process and Operations Documentss' to Experimental RFC (draft-alvestrand-ipod), Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Brian E Carpenter
• BOF: Transport-Enhancing Refinements to the Network Layer Interface (TERNLI), Lars Eggert
• Jun 11 2006
• RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Joel M. Halpern
• RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Margaret Wasserman
• RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Joel M. Halpern
• RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Margaret Wasserman
• Re: draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions, Douglas Otis
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions-00.txt], Keith Moore
• Jun 10 2006
• RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Michael StJohns
• RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Michael StJohns
• RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Margaret Wasserman
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions-00.txt], Henning Schulzrinne
• draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions, Douglas Otis
• [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions-00.txt], Brian E Carpenter
• Jun 09 2006
• Last Call Comments: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Bob Braden
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Michael StJohns
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Leslie Daigle
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Michael StJohns
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Michael StJohns
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Michael StJohns
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, william(at)elan.net
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Leslie Daigle
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, william(at)elan.net
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Eliot Lear
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Michael StJohns
• icalendar feeds for network/tech meeting calendar, Joe Abley
• Re: IETF Sites Support IPv6, Ray Pelletier
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, todd glassey
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-iab-rfc-editor-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Brian E Carpenter
• Jun 08 2006
• IETF 67 in San Diego, Ray Pelletier
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-iab-rfc-editor-00.txt, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-iab-rfc-editor-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Dave Cridland
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-iab-rfc-editor-00.txt, Eliot Lear
• Re: IETF Sites Support IPv6, Pekka Savola
• Jun 07 2006
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor, Leslie Daigle
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-iab-rfc-editor-00.txt, Leslie Daigle
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Dave Cridland
• Re: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Fred Baker
• RE: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Gray, Eric
• RE: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), John C Klensin
• RE: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), David Harrington
• RE: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Gray, Eric
• RE: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), John C Klensin
• Re: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Lucy E. Lynch
• Re: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Bob Braden
• RE: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Gray, Eric
• Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call:, Addison Phillips
• Re: IETF Sites Support IPv6, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Michael Thomas
• Re: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Scott W Brim
• Re: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Joel M. Halpern
• RE: Schema languages for XML (Was: Best practice for data encoding?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Schema languages for XML (Was: Best practice for data encoding?, Linn, John
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Theodore Tso
• Re: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: IETF, IAB, & RFC-Editor, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Brian E Carpenter
• Acknowledgements section in a RFC (Was: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Schema languages for XML (Was: Best practice for data encoding?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-iab-rfc-editor-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Dean Anderson
• Re: Last Call: 'Matching of Language Tags' to BCP (draft-ietf-ltru-matching), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Robert Sayre
• Jun 06 2006
• Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Mark Andrews
• Offpath BoF at Montreal IETF, Paul Francis
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Carsten Bormann
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Joe Touch
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, Christian Huitema
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Steven M. Bellovin
• RE: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Joe Touch
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IETF Sites Support IPv6, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• RE: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IETF Sites Support IPv6, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Joe Touch
• Re: Wasting address space (was: Re: Last Call: 'Considerations on the IPv6 Host density Metric' to Informational RFC (draft-huston-hd-metric)), Tim Chown
• IETF Sites Support IPv6, Ray Pelletier
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Tony Finch
• Re: Pre-IPV6 maintenance of one of the www.ietf.org servers - 2006/06/03 - 12:00am EST, Pekka Savola
• Re: Pre-IPV6 maintenance of one of the www.ietf.org servers - 2006/06/03 - 12:00am EST, Tim Chown
• RE: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, Tony Finch
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Eliot Lear
• Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Eliot Lear
• Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Joe Touch
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Randy Presuhn
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, Gray, Eric
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Michael Thomas
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, Fleischman, Eric
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, David Harrington
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Steven M. Bellovin
• RE: Best practice for data encoding?, David Harrington
• Jun 05 2006
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Randy Presuhn
• Re: Best practice for data encoding?, Carsten Bormann
• Best practice for data encoding?, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12, Cyrus Daboo
• Re: Wasting address space (was: Re: Last Call: 'Considerations on the IPv6 Host density Metric' to Informational RFC (draft-huston-hd-metric)), bmanning
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12, Julian Reschke
• Wasting address space (was: Re: Last Call: 'Considerations on the IPv6 Host density Metric' to Informational RFC (draft-huston-hd-metric)), Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Dave Crocker
• RE: Re: IETF, IAB, & RFC-Editor, Phil Maceri
• RE: Re: IETF, IAB, & RFC-Editor, Phil Maceri
• Re: IETF, IAB, & RFC-Editor, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Ietf mailing list probe message, ietf-bounces+21eb5e0c7d9d7d18caee2879a863dc6b6bf0c40b
• Re: IETF, IAB, & RFC-Editor, RJ Atkinson
• Re: Last Call: 'Considerations on the IPv6 Host density Metric' to Informational RFC (draft-huston-hd-metric), Steven Blake
• Last Call: 'Considerations on the IPv6 Host density Metric' to Informational RFC (draft-huston-hd-metric), Steven Blake
• Re: IETF, IAB, & RFC-Editor, Franck Martin
• Re: IETF, IAB, & RFC-Editor, Brian E Carpenter
• Part 2 - Pre-IPV6 maintenance of one of the www.ietf.org servers - 2006/06/04 - 09:30pm EST, ietf-secretariat
• Jun 03 2006
• Re: Last Call: 'Considerations on the IPv6 Host density Metric' to Informational RFC (draft-huston-hd-metric), Geoff Huston
• Re: Last Call: 'Considerations on the IPv6 Host density Metric' to Informational RFC (draft-huston-hd-metric), Geoff Huston
• Jun 03 2006
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)
• Pre-IPV6 maintenance of one of the www.ietf.org servers - 2006/06/03 - 12:00am EST, ietf-secretariat
• Jun 02 2006
• Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor, Bob Braden
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Leslie Daigle
• New IRTF RG chartered--Scalable Adaptive Multicast (SAM) RG, John Buford
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Lucy E. Lynch
• New IRTF RG chartered--Scalable Adaptive Multicast (SAM) RG, John Buford
• IETF 2008 - 2010 Meeting Calendar Adopted, Ray Pelletier
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,, Hidetoshi Yokota
• Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), C. M. Heard
• Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Gray, Eric
• Jun 01 2006
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Bob Braden
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Gray, Eric
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Bob Braden
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Gray, Eric
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Basavaraj Patil
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,, Subir Das
• IETF, IAB, & RFC-Editor, RJ Atkinson
• RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, bmanning
• Re: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Angelos D. Keromytis
• Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), Eric Rosen
• RE: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handl ing' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), Gray, Eric
• RE: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handl ing' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), Gray, Eric
• Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref), Eric Rosen
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Eliot Lear
• EAP Extensions (EAPExt) BoF Proposal Discussion, Narayanan, Vidya
• May 31 2006
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Fred Baker
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Bill Fenner
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Fred Baker
• RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Margaret Wasserman
• Out-of-Office AutoReply: draft-ietf-geopriv-location-types-registry-06.txt updated by Amy Vezza, Ted Hardie
• Creation of nettest mailing list, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
• May 30 2006
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, John C Klensin
• Re: IETF-SDO liaison, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF-SDO liaison (was Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Thomas Narten
• RE: IETF-SDO liaison (was Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Avi Lior
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Scott Bradner
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Geoff Huston
• IETF-SDO liaison (was Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Vijay Devarapalli
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Scott Bradner
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Michael StJohns
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Eliot Lear
• [no subject], Unknown
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Scott W Brim
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Eliot Lear
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Yaakov Stein
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Gray, Eric
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Gray, Eric
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Joel M. Halpern
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Yoshihiro Ohba
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,, Subir Das
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Stewart Bryant
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Bernard Aboba
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Florian Weimer
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Yoshihiro Ohba
• May 29 2006
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Brian E Carpenter
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Avi Lior
• RFC 3066 double Bis?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Harald Alvestrand
• RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin
• AW: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actuallyuseful?), Tschofenig, Hannes
• AW: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Tschofenig, Hannes
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Junghoon Jee
• May 28 2006
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• received processing power, Ashfaaq H Poonawala
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Bill Fenner
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• May 27 2006
• automatic discovery [Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?], Pekka Savola
• Re: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Jari Arkko
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Yoshihiro Ohba
• RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Yoshihiro Ohba
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Dave Crocker
• RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin
• Re: Kerberos, Jari Arkko
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Jari Arkko
• Re: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Dave Crocker
• RE: Kerberos, Narayanan, Vidya
• PANA vs. RADIUS/Diameter (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin
• Re: Kerberos, Jeffrey Hutzelman
• May 26 2006
• Re: AW: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Mohan Parthasarathy
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Lakshminath Dondeti
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Narayanan, Vidya
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Fleischman, Eric
• RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Vijay Devarapalli
• RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin
• Re: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Robert Sayre
• EAP/IKEv2 as an alternative to PANA (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Geoff Huston
• Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin
• Framework document scope (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin
• NEA scope (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?), Alper Yegin
• RE: Kerberos, Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Jari Arkko
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Sam Hartman
• AW: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Tschofenig, Hannes
• Kerberos, Sam Hartman
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Narayanan, Vidya
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Narayanan, Vidya
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Lakshminath Dondeti
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Lucy E. Lynch
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Gray, Eric
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Sam Hartman
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Dave Crocker
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Pete Resnick
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA partly useful?, Peter Dambier
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Peter Dambier
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Dave Crocker
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Sam Hartman
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Ralph Droms
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Bernard Aboba
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, "Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta"
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, "Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta"
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Joel M. Halpern
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Paul Hoffman
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Ralph Droms
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Dave Crocker
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Ralph Droms
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Sam Hartman
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Sam Hartman
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Jari Arkko
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Jari Arkko
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Joel M. Halpern
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Ralph Droms
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Jari Arkko
• Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Eliot Lear
• Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, "Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta"
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Avi Lior
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Alper Yegin
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Yoshihiro Ohba
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Bernard Aboba
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Bernard Aboba
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Yoshihiro Ohba
• Re: Last Call: 'SMTP Submission Service Extension for Future Message Release' to Proposed Standard (draft-vaudreuil-futuredelivery), Scott Kitterman
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Alper Yegin
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ash-alt-formats-02.txt, Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), ALABS
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Joel M. Halpern
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, John C Klensin
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Bernard Aboba
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Alper Yegin
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Leslie Daigle
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Sam Hartman
• Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Leslie Daigle
• May 25 2006
• Last Call: IETF Calendar 2008 - 2010 Ver 02, Ray Pelletier
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Bernard Aboba
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Lakshminath Dondeti
• Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control, Sam Hartman
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, John C Klensin
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, John C Klensin
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, todd glassey
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
• 'help', Sheikh, Usman Fakhar \(UMKC-Student\)
• RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)
• Re: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, Joel M. Halpern
• Call for Entries, Deadline 15th June 2006, Raju Sutar
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Harald Alvestrand
• Tracking IPR (Re: RFC Author Count and IPR), Harald Alvestrand
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Alper Yegin
• Re: cApitalization, Ross Finlayson
• Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, David Conrad
• Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, David Conrad
• Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, John C Klensin
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Vijay Devarapallli
• May 24 2006
• ARPAnet's Problems Persist Unsolved Today, Fleischman, Eric
• Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Josh Howlett
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
• Re: Authors and Editors (was Re: RFC Author Count and IPR), Bob Braden
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Lucy E. Lynch
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Lucy E. Lynch
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, John Loughney
• RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Lakshminath Dondeti
• Authors and Editors (was Re: RFC Author Count and IPR), Spencer Dawkins
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Andy Bierman
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman
• RE: RFC Author Count and IPR, Gray, Eric
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Ken Raeburn
• Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
• RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Russ Housley
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Vijay Devarapallli
• RE: RFC Author Count and IPR, Gray, Eric
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Russ Housley
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Bob Braden
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Vijay Devarapallli
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Russ Housley
• Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Pekka Savola
• RE: RFC Author Count and IPR, David Harrington
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Sam Hartman
• Re: cApitalization, Ned Freed
• Re: cApitalization, Ted Faber
• RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Stephen Kent
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, Masataka Ohta
• Re: RFC Author Count and IPR, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• RFC Author Count and IPR, Russ Housley
• [Sam Hartman] [Ietf-http-auth] BOF Request: WARP - Web Authentication Resistant to Phishing, Sam Hartman
• The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?, Sam Hartman
• Re: cApitalization, Dave Aronson
• Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, Eliot Lear
• Re: cApitalization, Noel Chiappa
• RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Pasi.Eronen
• Re: cApitalization, Bill Strahm
• May 23 2006
• Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt, John C Klensin
• Re: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Russ Housley
• RE: cApitalization, Bob O'Hara \(boohara\)
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Dave Crocker
• cApitalization, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Lars Eggert
• Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05, Pasi.Eronen
• FW: Fwd: TLS authorizations draft, Fleischman, Eric
• May 22 2006
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Cullen Jennings
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Lars Eggert
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, John C Klensin
• Re: Fwd: TLS authorizations draft, Eric Rescorla
• Re: Fwd: TLS authorizations draft, Stephen Kent
• RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
• RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Black_David
• RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Black_David
• negotiation of the parameters of SIP, TANIOS Charbel
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Dave Crocker
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, John C Klensin
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Dave Crocker
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, John C Klensin
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Dave Crocker
• May 21 2006
• Re: Last Call: 'IETF Process and Operations Documentss' to Experimental RFC (draft-alvestrand-ipod), John C Klensin
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Last Call: 'IETF Process and Operations Documentss' to Experimental RFC (draft-alvestrand-ipod), Harald Alvestrand
• May 20 2006
• cdma 2000, Ashfaaq H Poonawala
• May 19 2006
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, John C Klensin
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Spencer Dawkins
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: 'IETF Process and Operations Documentss' to Experimental RFC (draft-alvestrand-ipod), John C Klensin
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier
• Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp), Cullen Jennings
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt, Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier
• May 18 2006
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier
• Fwd: TLS authorizations draft, Russ Housley
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ólafur Guðmundsson
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Harald Alvestrand
• RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
• May 17 2006
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Allison Mankin
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Allison Mankin
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Scott W Brim
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Dave Crocker
• Re: FW: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, John C Klensin
• Fwd: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Marshall Eubanks
• appeal against an IESG decision, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier
• Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Joe Abley
• FW: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar, Ray Pelletier
• May 16 2006
• RE: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensionsfrom Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC, Margaret Wasserman