IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Announcements Archive]

Jan 05 2006

PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs)), John C Klensin
RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Gray, Eric
Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Stephen Sprunk
Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], John Levine
Permitting PDF and Postscript (was: RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs)), John C Klensin
RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), John C Klensin
Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Ken Raeburn
Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Eliot Lear
Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Stewart Bryant
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, william(at)elan.net
RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Gray, Eric
Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Stewart Bryant
Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Brett Thorson
Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sandy Wills
RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Gray, Eric
RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Gray, Eric
Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Eliot Lear
RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\)
Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Sandy Wills
RE: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Gray, Eric
Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Stewart Bryant
Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Scott W Brim
RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Gray, Eric
Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Stewart Bryant
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), John C Klensin
Re: More on the Secretariat Statement of Work (SOW), Brian E Carpenter
Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Ken Raeburn
Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\)
Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus based on reading tea leaves], Stewart Bryant
Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus based on reading tea leaves], Ralph Droms
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Peter Dambier
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Scott Kitterman
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Brian E Carpenter
Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus based on reading tea leaves], Brian E Carpenter
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Ole Jacobsen
Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Jari Arkko
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\)
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Frank Ellermann
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Yaakov Stein

Jan 04 2006

Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Julian Reschke
Re: bozoproofing DKIM concerns, John Levine
Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Spencer Dawkins
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Scott Kitterman
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Michael Thomas
Likely DKIM endgame, Dave Crocker
Re: Likely DKIM endgame, Eric Rescorla
Re: bozoproofing DKIM concerns, Douglas Otis
Re: bozoproofing DKIM concerns, Eric Rescorla
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Theodore Ts'o
bozoproofing DKIM concerns, Dave Crocker
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Gray, Eric
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\)
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Gray, Eric
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\)
RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Gray, Eric
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\)
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Theodore Ts'o
Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Stewart Bryant
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Eric Rescorla
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Randy.Dunlap
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Sam Hartman
Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Brian E Carpenter
Re: WG Review: EAP Method Update (emu), Sam Hartman
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Tony Finch
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John R Levine
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Sam Hartman
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John R Levine
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Sam Hartman
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John Levine
RE: [Ipsec] Last call comments about "Repeated Authentication in IKEv2", Yoav Nir
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Sam Hartman
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Sam Hartman
Alternatives to DKIM, Sam Hartman
Last call comments about "Repeated Authentication in IKEv2", Pasi . Eronen
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Julian Reschke
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Masataka Ohta
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, James Seng
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Bob Braden

Jan 03 2006

Re: The Value of Reputation, Jim Fenton
Re: The Value of Reputation, John Leslie
optional clip screening in H.323 supplementary service, Daniele Giordano
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: The Value of Reputation, Jim Fenton
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Larry J. Blunk
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Gray, Eric
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Ned Freed
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Ned Freed
Working Group chartering, Dave Crocker
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Randy.Dunlap
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Support for cooperative work (Was: Alternative formats for IDs, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Tony Hansen
RE: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Pasi . Eronen
Re: WG Review: EAP Method Update (emu), Jari Arkko
RE: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Bernard Aboba
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Peter Dambier
Re: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Bernard Aboba
Re: participation sans meeting attendance (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Melinda Shore
Re: WG Review: EAP Method Update (emu), Jari Arkko
Re: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Jari Arkko
RE: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Pasi . Eronen
RE: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Pasi . Eronen
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Stephen Farrell
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jari Arkko
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Russ Allbery
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John R Levine
RE: Consensus based on reading tea leaves (was: Re: Alternativeformatsfor IDs), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Diff tools (Was: Re: Alternative formats for IDs), Jari Arkko
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Randy Presuhn
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jeffrey Hutzelman
participation sans meeting attendance (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Randy.Dunlap
objection to proposed change to "consensus", Randy Presuhn
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Doug Royer
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, grenville armitage
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), John Levine
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Dave Crocker
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Douglas Otis
Re: SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc., Douglas Otis
Re: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Bernard Aboba
Re: bozo-proofing the net (or making better bozos?), Bernard Aboba

Jan 02 2006

Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, John Levine
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Ned Freed
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, John Levine
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Ned Freed
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Dave Crocker
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Tom.Petch
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin
Re: bozo-proofing the net (or making better bozos?), John Levine
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Marshall Eubanks
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Noel Chiappa
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, John C Klensin
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John C Klensin
RE: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Mark Foster
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Dave Crocker
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin
Re: bozo-proofing the net (or making better bozos?), Bernard Aboba
Re: WG Review: EAP Method Update (emu), Clint Chaplin
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Frank Ellermann
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Scott Bradner
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, john . loughney
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, john . loughney
Re: Back to chartering DKIM [was bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation], Douglas Otis
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Russ Housley
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Mr. James W. Laferriere
RE: Consensus based on reading tea leaves (was: Re: Alternativeformatsfor IDs), Yaakov Stein
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Brian E Carpenter
Back to chartering DKIM [was bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation], Tony Hansen
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Peter Dambier
Re: bozoproofing the IETF process, was bozoproofing the net, John Levine
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Paul Hoffman
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, David B Harrington
Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: Consensus based on reading tea leaves (was: Re: Alternative formatsfor IDs), Spencer Dawkins
Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, John Loughney
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Florian Weimer
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, grenville armitage
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, william(at)elan.net
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Dave Crocker
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Frank Ellermann
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Peter Dambier
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Julian Reschke
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Dave Crocker
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tim Bray
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tim Bray
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tim Bray
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jari Arkko
RE: Consensus based on reading tea leaves (was: Re: Alternative formatsfor IDs), Yaakov Stein
Re: SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc., Frank Ellermann
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John R Levine
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Dave Crocker
Re: SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc., Douglas Otis
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John C Klensin

Jan 01 2006

Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Douglas Otis
Re: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Bernard Aboba
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, william(at)elan.net
Re: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Eric Rescorla
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Dave Crocker
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John R Levine
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John C Klensin
Consensus based on reading tea leaves (was: Re: Alternative formats for IDs), Spencer Dawkins
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Frank Ellermann
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Julian Reschke
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Julian Reschke
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jari Arkko
RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Frank Ellermann
Re: SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc., Frank Ellermann
Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John Levine
RE: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Bernard Aboba

Dec 31 2005

Re: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), John C Klensin
Re: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), John Leslie
Re: SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc. (was: The Value of Reputation), Douglas Otis

Dec 30 2005

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: DomainKeys Identified Mail (dkim)), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc. (was: The Value of Reputation), Frank Ellermann
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, James Cloos

Dec 28 2005

Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Randy Presuhn
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch
Re: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review:Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), Hector Santos
Re: The Value of Reputation, Douglas Otis
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch
RE: Need to know the procedure, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Julian Reschke
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch
Re: Need to know the procedure, Jari Arkko
Need to know the procedure, ChandraMohan
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Masataka Ohta
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch
Re: The Value of Reputation, Frank Ellermann

Dec 27 2005

Re: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), Douglas Otis
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), william(at)elan.net
The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)), Nathaniel Borenstein
RE: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Pasi . Eronen
RE: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: DomainKeys Identified Mail) (dkim) {4.2}, Patrick Peterson

Dec 26 2005

Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Ned Freed
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Masataka Ohta
Re: Accessibility was Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Dec 25 2005

Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Randy.Dunlap
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Nathaniel Borenstein

Dec 24 2005

Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Ned Freed
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tim Bray
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Douglas Otis
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch
ABNF Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Masataka Ohta
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Eric Rescorla
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Ned Freed
RE: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: More on the Secretariat Statement of Work (SOW), Spencer Dawkins

Dec 23 2005

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Nathaniel Borenstein
More on the Secretariat Statement of Work (SOW), Bernard Aboba
IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Bernard Aboba
Review of draft-nir-ikev2-auth-lt-04.txt, Bernard Aboba
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), william(at)elan.net
Accessibility was Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Frank Ellermann
Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Masataka Ohta
Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Hadmut Danisch
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), william(at)elan.net
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Mark Delany
Re: [ietf-dkim] Timeframes & status for external consumption, Andrew Newton
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Michael Thomas
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), John C Klensin

Dec 22 2005

Re: Pre-picking one solution, Douglas Otis
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker
Re: Announcement: Notifications List, Keith Moore
RE: Announcement: Notifications List, Burger, Eric
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), John C Klensin
Re: Pre-picking one solution, Frank Ellermann
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Douglas Otis
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Jim Fenton
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Jim Fenton
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Michael Thomas
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Keith Moore
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), william(at)elan.net
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Barry Leiba
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), william(at)elan.net
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Spencer Dawkins
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Spencer Dawkins
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Keith Moore
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Stephen Farrell
Re: Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Keith Moore
Pre-picking one solution (Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail) (dkim), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: WG Review: EAP Method Update (emu), Pekka Savola
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Cullen Jennings
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Frank Ellermann
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Barry Leiba
Re: RFCyyyy on Definitions of Managed Objects for High Bit-Rate DSL - 2nd generation HDSL and Single-Pair High-Speed Digital Subscri, Frank Solensky
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore

Dec 21 2005

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Barry Leiba
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Stephen Farrell
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Keith Moore
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Ted Hardie
Re: RFCyyyy on Definitions of Managed Objects for High Bit-Rate DSL - 2nd generation HDSL and Single-Pair High-Speed Digital Subscri, Bob Braden
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), william(at)elan.net
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Tony Hansen
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), william(at)elan.net
FW: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-03.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Barry Leiba
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Barry Leiba
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), John C Klensin
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Stephen Farrell
Re: RFCyyyy on Definitions of Managed Objects for High Bit-Rate DSL - 2nd generation HDSL and Single-Pair High-Speed Digital Subscri, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Stephen Farrell
RE: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Yaakov Stein
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Jim Fenton
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Eric Rescorla
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Sam Hartman
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Paul Hoffman
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Eric Rescorla
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Frank Ellermann
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Ted Hardie

Dec 20 2005

Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Ted Hardie
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Dave Crocker
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Dave Crocker
Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Ted Hardie
Re: MIME Question - Boundary Redefined, John C Klensin
Re: MIME Question - Boundary Redefined, Keith Moore
Re: MIME Question - Boundary Redefined, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
MIME Question - Boundary Redefined, Carl Hester
shortsightedness of ARP or lack thereof, Keith Moore
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Noel Chiappa
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Bob Braden
RE: Announcement: Notifications List, David B Harrington
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Keith Moore
Re: Announcement: Notifications List, Keith Moore
RE: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: IASA NeuStar SOW Update, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Keith Moore
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Dave Crocker
Announcement: Notifications List, Burger, Eric
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Brian E Carpenter
The DSN exploit, Douglas Otis

Dec 19 2005

Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Frank Ellermann
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Keith Moore
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Sam Hartman
REOPENENED Call for Nominations, NomCom05, Ralph Droms
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Keith Moore
RE: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Keith Moore
RE: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Keith Moore
Re: IASA NeuStar SOW Update, Bernard Aboba
Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], Brian E Carpenter
Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Sam Hartman

Dec 17 2005

Re: The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, Anthony G. Atkielski
The rights of email senders and IETF rough consensus, wayne
REOPENENED Call for Nominations, NomCom05, Ralph Droms
Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Sam Hartman

Dec 16 2005

RE: Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high volume spam, Gray, Eric
Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann
Re: IASA NeuStar SOW Update, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Marshall Eubanks
Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Bill Fenner
Re: Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high volume spam, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann
Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov
Re: Last Call: 'Lemonade Profile' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann
Pro SPAM WG: How security could benefit from high volume spam, Peter Dambier
Re: Last call IETF experiments, Brian E Carpenter
Re: How security could benefit from high volume spam, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

Dec 15 2005

Re: Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Steven M. Bellovin
IAOC News Announcement, Lucy E. Lynch
Enough RE: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Frank Ellermann
IASA NeuStar SOW Update, Ray Pelletier

Dec 14 2005

Re: How security could benefit from high volume spam, Hadmut Danisch
Re: Last call IETF experiments, Frank Ellermann
Re: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Douglas Otis
Re: Last call IETF experiments, Scott Bradner
Re: Last call IETF experiments, Sam Hartman
SES vs BATV, Douglas Otis
SES or BATV (was: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02), Frank Ellermann
Re: How security could benefit from high volume spam, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Douglas Otis
Re: How security could benefit from high volume spam, Frank Ellermann
Re: How security could benefit from high volume spam, Peter Dambier
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net
Re: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, Chris Lilley
FW: [blilly at erols.com: Re: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry], Michelle Cotton
RE: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, IANA
How security could benefit from high volume spam, Hadmut Danisch

Dec 13 2005

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Douglas Otis
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Keith Moore
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Douglas Otis
Re: Last call IETF experiments, Frank Ellermann

Dec 12 2005

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne
Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, Bob Braden
Re: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, Chris Lilley
Re: Definition of SFTP ..., Joseph Salowey
Re: Last call IETF experiments (was: Appeal ....), John C Klensin
[reminder] 8th IPv6 Interoperability Test Event, Yukiyo Akisada

Dec 11 2005

Re: Last call IETF experiments, Frank Ellermann
Last call IETF experiments (was: Appeal ....), Frank Ellermann
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman
Fwd: Need for a rebuild [was I-D file formats and internationalization], Eduardo Mendez
Re: Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, Bruce Lilly
Problem with IANA MIME media types registry, Bruce Lilly
Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, wayne

Dec 10 2005

Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, John C Klensin
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman
Individual submissions and Informational RFCs, wayne
Re: declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, Frank Ellermann
Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, John Levine
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne
Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, wayne

Dec 09 2005

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann
Report: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Lucy E. Lynch
Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, Dave Crocker
Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational, John Levine
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Bob Braden
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dick St.Peters
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne
Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dick St.Peters
Re: Any Final Comments on the IETF Trust, Scott Bradner
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net
Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear
Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard, Pekka Savola
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Pekka Savola
Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], Lucy E. Lynch
unsubscribe, 高明军
Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

Dec 08 2005

Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann
The Trust Agreement Proposal, Bob Hinden
Re: [IAOC] I know I am dumb stupid but I am also dumb stubborn [was IETF Trust license is too restricted], Lucy E. Lynch
Any Final Comments on the IETF Trust, Lucy E. Lynch
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Sam Hartman
Re: [IAOC] Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson
The Trust Agreement Proposal, John C Klensin
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Lucy E. Lynch
Re: Definition of SFTP ..., Brian E Carpenter
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson
Re: [IAOC] Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Brian E Carpenter
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Lucy E. Lynch
Re: The IETF Trust License is too restricted, Simon Josefsson
Re: Definition of SFTP ..., Frank Ellermann
IAB appeal (was: off-topic?), Frank Ellermann

Mail converted by MHonArc