IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Nov 01 2007
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Scott Brim
• RE: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: PerformanceMetrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Dan Schutzer
• RE: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)], Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Experimental track (was: Non-participants), Frank Ellermann
• Re: About referenced documents..., Frank Ellermann
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Simon Josefsson
• Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Dan Riley
• Re: About referenced documents..., Randy Presuhn
• Re: About referenced documents..., Tom Yu
• Re: About referenced documents..., Brian E Carpenter
• Oct 31 2007
• secdir review of draft-ietf-v6ops-scanning-implications-03, Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: About referenced documents..., lconroy
• Re: About referenced documents..., Andrew G. Malis
• Re: About referenced documents..., Tom Yu
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-xcon-framework (A Framework for Centralized Conferencing) to Proposed Standard, SM
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Dr. JunIchiro 'Itojun' Hagino, Jun Murai
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-xcon-framework (A Framework for Centralized Conferencing) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Frank Ellermann
• Re: Non-participants, Frank Ellermann
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: 2026, draft, full, etc., Hallam-Baker, Phillip