IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Oct 30 2007
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Ned Freed
• Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Ned Freed
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Brian E Carpenter
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., James M. Polk
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, peter_blatherwick
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Dave Crocker
• Re: Non-participants [Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz], Andrew Newton
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• RE: 2026, draft, full, etc., michael.dillon
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Yaakov Stein
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Yaakov Stein
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Eric Burger
• Re: 2026, draft, full, etc., Dave Cridland
• 2026, draft, full, etc., Eliot Lear
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, michael.dillon
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Simon Josefsson
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Ted Hardie
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Byung-Hee HWANG
• Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics at Other Layers (pmol)], Yangwoo Ko
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Dave Crocker
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Lawrence Rosen