IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Oct 29 2007
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Peter Dambier
• Oct 29 2007
• Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
• RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Lawrence Rosen
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Simon Josefsson
• RE: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Eric Burger
• Patents can be for good, not only evil, Eric Burger
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Brian E Carpenter
• Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics at Other Layers (pmol)], Sam Hartman
• A question about [Fwd: WG Review: Performance Metrics at Other Layers (pmol)], Leslie Daigle
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Keith Moore
• Re: Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, Henning Schulzrinne
• RE: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Lawrence Rosen
• Oppose draft-carpenter-ipr-patent-frswds-00, James M. Polk
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Bob Braden
• Re: Nominet position paper about Signing the Root., Thierry Moreau
• Nominet position paper about Signing the Root., Roy Arends
• Minor addition to draft-williams-on-channel-binding; one week to respond, Sam Hartman
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Sam Hartman
• RE: Silly TLS Auth lobbying, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Bill Sommerfeld
• Re: rejection of patents and standards, Eric Burger
• Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz, Eric Rosen
• Re: Free? Software Foundation, Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Silly TLS Auth lobbying, Simon Josefsson