IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Oct 24 2007
• Re: A priori IPR choices, Ted Hardie
• Re: A priori IPR choices, Scott Kitterman
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Sam Hartman
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Tony Finch
• RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-framework (A Framework for Packet Selection and Reporting) to Informational RFC, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls-02.txt, Lars Eggert
• Re: A priori IPR choices, Frank Ellermann
• FYI 28 (was: A priori IPR choices), Frank Ellermann
• Re: A priori IPR choices, Norbert Bollow
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Simon Josefsson
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Theodore Tso
• Re: A priori IPR choices, Lawrence Rosen
• Re: A priori IPR choices, Scott Kitterman
• Re: A priori IPR choices, Brian E Carpenter
• Oct 23 2007
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Sam Hartman
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Sam Hartman
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Ted Hardie
• Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Ted Hardie
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Sam Hartman
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Ted Hardie
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Ted Hardie
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Sam Hartman
• When is using patented technology appropriate?, Sam Hartman
• Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Sam Hartman
• RE: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns], Hallam-Baker, Phillip