IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Sep 18 2007
• Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Paul Vixie
• Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: security review of draft-ietf-mip6-ha-switch-03.txt, Jari Arkko
• Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Lixia Zhang
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Dave Crocker
• RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Ted Hardie
• Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Jeroen Massar
• RE: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it), Tony Hain
• RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Tony Hain
• Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana (DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry) to Informational RFC, Peter Koch
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard, Tom.Petch
• Re: Subscribtion and qustion, Felipe Rodrigues
• RE: [Simple] Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-prescaps-ext (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent Capability Extension to Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)) to Proposed Standard, Nancy Greene
• Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Lars Eggert
• Sep 17 2007
• Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, John Day
• Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Tony Finch
• RE: RFC-1345 "mnemonics", michael.dillon
• RE: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association thatspans transports?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: RFC-1345 "mnemonics", RJ Atkinson
• Re: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering), Scott Brim
• RE: Last Call: draft-drage-sipping-service-identification (A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for the Identification of Services) to Informational RFC, Atle Monrad
• Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, John Day
• Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Michael Tuexen
• Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?, Lars Eggert