IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- May 08 2005
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Bill Fenner
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Geoff Huston
- RE: improving WG operation, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: improving WG operation, Keith Moore
- Re: improving WG operation, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Margaret Wasserman
- Re: text suggested by ADs, avri
- Re: improving WG operation, Tom Lord
- Re: improving WG operation, Tom Lord
- Re: improving WG operation, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Joe Touch
- Re: improving WG operation, Tom Lord
- Re: improving WG operation, Keith Moore
- RE: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Christian Huitema
- RE: improving WG operation, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- May 07 2005
- Appreciation Evening for Vint Cerf & Bob Kahn - May 10, Gene Gaines
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Dave Crocker
- RE: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Margaret Wasserman
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Sam Hartman
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Dave Crocker
- Re: improving WG operation, John C Klensin
- Re: improving WG operation, Dave Crocker
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Sam Hartman
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Sam Hartman
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Sam Hartman
- RE: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Christian Huitema
- Re: "straightforward, reasonable, and fair", JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Joel M. Halpern
- Re: improving WG operation, John C Klensin
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), John C Klensin
- Re: "straightforward, reasonable, and fair", Pekka Savola
- Re: "straightforward, reasonable, and fair", Ralph Droms
- May 06 2005
- May 05 2005
- last post on Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: improving WG operation, Joe Touch
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Joe Touch
- Re: improving WG operation, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: improving WG operation, Joe Touch
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Joe Touch
- Re: improving WG operation, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Joe Touch
- Re: improving WG operation, Joe Touch
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Joe Touch
- Re: Time to charter, Joe Touch
- Re: "straightforward, reasonable, and fair", Pekka Savola
- Re: "straightforward, reasonable, and fair", Keith Moore
- Re: Technically-astute non-ADs (was: Re: text suggested by ADs), Dave Crocker
- Re: Technically-astute non-ADs (was: Re: text suggested by ADs), John C Klensin
- Re: Technically-astute non-ADs (was: Re: text suggested by ADs), Ralph Droms
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Ralph Droms
- Re: "straightforward, reasonable, and fair", Ralph Droms
- RE: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), john . loughney
- Re: What's the value of specification consistency?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- May 04 2005
- "straightforward, reasonable, and fair", Keith Moore
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Jari Arkko
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Dave Crocker
- Re: IETF Throughput (was RE: Voting (again)), Dave Crocker
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Dave Crocker
- RE: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Soliman, Hesham
- What's the value of specification consistency?, Ted Hardie
- RE: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Alia Atlas
- Re: improving WG operation, Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Moving forward on IETF problems, Bruce Lilly
- Re: improving WG operation, Alex Zinin
- Re: Moving forward on IETF problems, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Moving forward on IETF problems, ned . freed
- RE: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Soliman, Hesham
- Re: Voting (again), Margaret Wasserman
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: Moving forward on IETF problems, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: text suggested by ADs, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Brian E Carpenter
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: IETF Throughput (was RE: Voting (again)), Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Time to charter, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Ralph Droms
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Ralph Droms
- May 02 2005
- May 02 2005
- Technically-astute non-ADs (was: Re: text suggested by ADs), John C Klensin
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: improving WG operation, Keith Moore
- Re: improving WG operation, Yakov Rekhter
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Yakov Rekhter
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Yakov Rekhter
- Re: improving WG operation, Tom Petch
- Re: improving WG operation, Dave Crocker
- Re: improving WG operation, John C Klensin
- RE: improving WG operation, John C Klensin
- Re: improving WG operation, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Yakov Rekhter
- RE: improving WG operation, Steve Silverman
- Moving forward on IETF problems, Bruce Lilly
- Re: improving WG operation, Eliot Lear
- Re: improving WG operation, Alex Zinin
- Re: improving WG operation, Dave Crocker
- Re: improving WG operation, Margaret Wasserman
- Re: text suggested by ADs, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Apr 30 2005
- Apr 30 2005
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Dave Crocker
- IETF Throughput (was RE: Voting (again)), Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), ALABS
- Re: technical supervisors (was: improving WG operation), John C Klensin
- Re: technical supervisors (was: improving WG operation), Keith Moore
- Where is the IESG?, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: technical supervisors (was: improving WG operation), Pekka Savola
- technical supervisors (was: improving WG operation), Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Ralph Droms
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), John Leslie
- Apr 29 2005
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: Time to charter (was: Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again))), Dave Crocker
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Dave Crocker
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Frank Ellermann
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Joe Touch
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Dave Crocker
- Re: improving WG operation, Dave Crocker
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Bob Braden
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Bob Braden
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Dave Crocker
- Re: text suggested by ADs, John C Klensin
- Time to charter (was: Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again))), John C Klensin
- Re: improving WG operation, John C Klensin
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Bob Braden
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: improving WG operation, Keith Moore
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Jari Arkko
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Soliman, Hesham
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Ralph Droms
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), Jari Arkko
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), Keith Moore
- NSIS/NTLP Interoperability Event before IETF in Paris, Martin Stiemerling
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Jari Arkko
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Jari Arkko
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), Jari Arkko
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Dave Crocker
- Re: Re: text suggested by ADs, John Loughney
- RE: Voting (again), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Dave Crocker
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Important protocol development, Dave Crocker
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), Dave Crocker
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Important protocol development, Aaron Falk
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], John C Klensin
- Apr 28 2005
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Fred Baker
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- RE: text suggested by ADs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Important protocol development, Elwyn Davies
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Ralph Droms
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Joe Touch
- RE: Important protocol development, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Ralph Droms
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Randy Presuhn
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Joe Touch
- Re: improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), John C Klensin
- Re: text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- Re: text suggested by ADs, John C Klensin
- text suggested by ADs, Keith Moore
- RE: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Dave Crocker
- Re: Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- improving WG operation (was Re: Voting (again)), Keith Moore
- Re: Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Spencer Dawkins
- Re: what should I do IRT a draft I partly support and oppose, Sam Hartman
- RE: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Pekka Savola
- RE: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\)
- Re: Re: Voting (again), John Loughney
- Re: Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), John Loughney
- Re: Re: Voting (again), John Loughney
- Re: Voting (again), Pekka Savola
- Re: Separated document review [Re: Voting (again)], Pekka Savola
- Apr 27 2005
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- Re: Voting (again), Fred Baker
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- Re: Voting (again), Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- what should I do IRT a draft I partly support and oppose, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Separated document review [Re: Voting (again)], Adrian Farrel
- Separated document review [Re: Voting (again)], Pekka Savola
- Re: Voting (again), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Important protocol development, Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Important protocol development, Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Important protocol development, Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Edward Lewis
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Edward Lewis
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Voting (again), Eliot Lear
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Voting (again), Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Jari Arkko
- Re: What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Jari Arkko
- What's been done [Re: Voting (again)], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- Re: Spreading/reducing the load (was: Re: Voting (again)), Keith Moore
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- Spreading/reducing the load (was: Re: Voting (again)), John C Klensin
- Re: Voting (again), Doug Royer
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- Apr 26 2005
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- Re: Voting (again), Sam Hartman
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Voting (again), John C Klensin
- Re: Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Edward Lewis
- Complaining about ADs to Nomcom (Re: Voting (again)), Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Voting (again), Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- Re: Voting (again), Sam Hartman
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Sam Hartman
- Apr 25 2005
- Apr 24 2005
- Apr 22 2005
- Apr 20 2005
- Apr 19 2005
- Re: Voting (again), william(at)elan.net
- Re: Voting (again), Eliot Lear
- Re: Voting Idea?, Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), william(at)elan.net
- Re: Voting (again), Eliot Lear
- Re: Another Bogus DNS wildcard ??, Bruce Lilly
- RE: Voting (again), Bob Braden
- RE: Voting (again), Fleischman, Eric
- RE: Voting (again), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Voting (again), Yakov Rekhter
- RE: Voting (again), Noel Chiappa
- Another Bogus DNS wildcard ??, Doug Royer
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- Apr 18 2005
- Apr 17 2005
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IENs: 127, 117, 93, Bob Braden
- Re: IENs: 127, 117, 93, Scott Bradner
- Re: IENs: 127, 117, 93, Scott Bradner
- Re: IENs: 127, 117, 93, Bill Manning
- RE: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- RE: Voting (again), bill
- RE: IENs: 127, 117, 93, bill
- RE: Voting (again), Noel Chiappa
- IENs: 127, 117, 93, Root Database Manager
- Apr 16 2005
- Apr 15 2005
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: As there a PERSON email address at the IESG?, Ted Hardie
- Re: Voting (again), Sam Hartman
- As there a PERSON email address at the IESG?, Doug Royer
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Voting (again), Keith Moore
- WSIS [Re: Voting (again)], Brian E Carpenter
- Apr 14 2005
- Apr 13 2005
- Re: Voting (again), Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Voting (again), Frank Ellermann
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Ari Ollikainen
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Voting (again), Dave Crocker
- Re: Voting (again), Joe Touch
- Re: Voting (again), Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Voting (again), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, ned . freed
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Stephen Casner
- Apr 12 2005
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Colin Perkins
- Voting (again), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Robert Elz
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Colin Perkins
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Robert Elz
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Colin Perkins
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Kireeti Kompella
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Colin Perkins
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Colin Perkins
- RE: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, ned . freed
- RE: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Scott Hollenbeck
- Re: IMS, IM-SSF, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, ned . freed
- Re: Please review updated 1id-guidelines, Bob Braden
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Colin Perkins
- Apr 11 2005
- Apr 10 2005
- Apr 09 2005
- Apr 08 2005
- I-D/RFC source formats, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Voting Idea?, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Francis Dupont
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' toInformational RFC, Bill Fenner
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bill Fenner
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bill Fenner
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov
- Re: Registering NIDs with purpose of being unique, Dave Tessman
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Keith Moore
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Arun Sankar
- Re: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' t o Informational RFC, Joe Touch
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' t o Informational RFC, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bill Sommerfeld
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' toInformational RFC, Elwyn davies
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Elwyn davies
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Stewart Bryant
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' toInformational RFC, Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\)
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Scott W Brim
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to ..., Scott Bradner
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Elwyn davies
- RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Elwyn davies
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Stewart Bryant
- Re: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Stewart Bryant
- Apr 07 2005
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Keith Moore
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis-00.txt, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Keith Moore
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-02.txt, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Jeroen Massar
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Voting vs. reasoned debate vs. "rough consensus", Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Voting Idea?, Sam Hartman
- RE: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Arvind, Krishnamoorthy
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter
- Voting vs. reasoned debate vs. "rough consensus", Bruce Lilly
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Thomas Narten
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov
- Re: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Carl Malamud
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Alex Rousskov
- Re: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Scott Bradner
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Jari Arkko
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Jeroen Massar
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Pekka Savola
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Thomas Narten
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Thomas Narten
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Brian E Carpenter
- Intermediate Drafts of network layer protocols, Syed Farooq Ahmed
- Re: Fw: Presence -Watcher clarification, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Apr 06 2005
- Re: Last Call: 'Scripting Media Types' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Scott W Brim
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bill Fenner
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bill Fenner
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Pekka Savola
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Julian Reschke
- Fw: Presence -Watcher clarification, Rg
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF DraftSubmission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Bruce Lilly
- Voting Idea? (Was: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC), Jeroen Massar
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Sandy Wills
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC, ned . freed
- Apr 05 2005
- Apr 04 2005
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: What? No PPT or wireless? [Re: IETF63 wireless], Dave Crocker
- IMS, IM-SSF, Nuno Novo
- Call for nominations: IAOC positions selected by the NomCom, Danny McPherson
- Re: Proceedings missing, Michael Lee
- Proceedings missing, Edward Lewis
- Get your hand-clock repliacs todday conner, Ali Hogan
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Benyamin Nasution
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Apr 03 2005
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Eric Rescorla
- Nowhere is perfect [Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, avri
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Eric Rescorla
- Re: New regulations for US Visa Waiver Programme (was RE: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usageby visitors? ), Brian E Carpenter
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Eric Rescorla
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Carsten Bormann
- RE: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Christian Huitema
- Apr 02 2005
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Dean Anderson
- Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures' to BCP, Bruce Lilly
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Eric Rescorla
- Re: New regulations for US Visa Waiver Programme (was RE: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usageby visitors? ), Henk Uijterwaal
- RE: New regulations for US Visa Waiver Programme (was RE: frenchcrypto regulations relating to personal encryption usagebyvisitors? ), Elwyn davies
- Re: New regulations for US Visa Waiver Programme (was RE: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usageby visitors? ), Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Sam Hartman
- New regulations for US Visa Waiver Programme (was RE: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usageby visitors? ), Elwyn davies
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Ole Jacobsen
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Sam Hartman
- Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?, Sam Hartman
- Apr 01 2005
- Mar 31 2005
- Mar 30 2005
Mail converted by MHonArc