IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]

Jul 31 2007

Re: On firewall traversal vs. bypass, Melinda Shore
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Arnt Gulbrandsen
Re: about RSVP : Admin hello disable., Adrian Farrel
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Adrian Farrel
On firewall traversal vs. bypass, Aki Niemi
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Julian Reschke
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Jeffrey Altman
about RSVP : Admin hello disable., shivakumar

Jul 30 2007

Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Andy Bierman
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Ken Raeburn
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Michael Thomas
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Edward Lewis
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Matt Pounsett
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Lyndon Nerenberg
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Fred Baker
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Andy Bierman
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, John C Klensin
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Carsten Bormann
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, John C Klensin
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Bill Manning
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Bill Manning
Re: IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Spencer Dawkins
Re: IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Tony Li
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Doug Ewell
Re: IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, John C Klensin

Jul 29 2007

Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Ole Jacobsen
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Adrian Farrel
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Marc Manthey
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Arnt Gulbrandsen
IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Peter Dambier
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, John C Klensin
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Stewart Bryant
Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Harald Alvestrand

Jul 27 2007

Re: IETF 69 ical Agent Generator bug?, Henrik Levkowetz
Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: e2e, Brian E Carpenter
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Re: e2e, Steven M. Bellovin
Re: RFC Announcement Format, Philip Matthews
Re: e2e, Joel Jaeggli
RE: e2e, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: e2e, Noel Chiappa
Re: e2e, Lixia Zhang

Jul 26 2007

Re: e2e, Scott Brim
e2e, John Kristoff
Re: ICE deployment data before LC for RFC, Henry Sinnreich
Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Black_David
RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-05.txt, Black_David
Re: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-05, Vijay K. Gurbani
RE: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-05, Tobias Gondrom
RE: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-05, Tobias Gondrom
RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-05.txt, Black_David
Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-05.txt, Black_David
IETF 69 ical Agent Generator bug?, Yangwoo Ko

Jul 25 2007

RFC Announcement Format, Bill McQuillan
Re: Last Call comment: draft-rosenberg-sip-app-media-tag-01.txt, Dave Crocker
Re: Last Call comment: draft-rosenberg-sip-app-media-tag-01.txt, Ted Hardie
Re: Last Call comment: draft-rosenberg-sip-app-media-tag-01.txt, Dave Crocker

Jul 24 2007

Last Call comment: draft-rosenberg-sip-app-media-tag-01.txt, Ted Hardie
Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
RE: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Narayanan, Vidya
Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Jari Arkko
Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Sam Hartman
Re: IETF Streaming, Scott O. Bradner
Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Jari Arkko
Re: IETF Streaming, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: IETF Streaming, Jeffrey Altman
RE: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Russ Housley
IAOC office hours, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
RE: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Narayanan, Vidya
Re: IETF Streaming, Marc Manthey
Re: IETF Streaming, Jeffrey Altman
Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Russ Housley
Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Sam Hartman
Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)

Jul 23 2007

Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
Re: WG Action: RECHARTER: Kerberos (krb-wg), Sam Hartman
Re: Updating the rules?, Sam Hartman
HP nc4010 power supply??, Robert (IETF) Moskowitz

Jul 22 2007

Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Stephane Bortzmeyer

Jul 21 2007

Re: take the train in Chicago, Russ Housley
IETF Streaming, Joel Jaeggli

Jul 20 2007

Re: Updating the rules?, Bob Braden
Re: Updating the rules?, Kurt Zeilenga
Re: Updating the rules?, Philip Matthews
"Self-Address Fixing Evolution (SAFE) -- STUN Controlled Middlebox Traversal" Bar-BoF - SUNDAY, July 22, 2007 8pm, Hannes Tschofenig
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Re: Audio Streaming - IETF69 Chicago Illinois USA July 22nd-27th, Joel Jaeggli

Jul 19 2007

Re: Audio Streaming - IETF69 Chicago Illinois USA July 22nd-27th, Lucy Lynch
Re: Audio Streaming - IETF69 Chicago Illinois USA July 22nd-27th, Philip Matthews
Re: [OT] Internet / DNS Timeline (The History of the Internet DNS), Joe Baptista
Re: [OT] Internet / DNS Timeline (The History of the Internet DNS), Roy Arends
[OT] Internet / DNS Timeline (The History of the Internet DNS), Joe Baptista

Jul 18 2007

RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, michael.dillon
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: Peers, servers and consumers (was RE: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Peers, servers and consumers (was RE: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition), Ted Hardie
RE: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Jul 17 2007

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-05.txt, Colin Perkins
Authority-to-Individuals Emergency Services Bar-BOF: Update, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-05.txt, Colin Perkins
Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-05.txt, Colin Perkins
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Brian E Carpenter
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Brian E Carpenter
RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, michael.dillon
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-04, Douglas Otis
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
[OT] DNS test of validity of a claim ROOT fracture, Joe Baptista

Jul 16 2007

Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Douglas Otis
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
secdir review of draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-04, David Harrington
Re: take the train in Chicago, Dave Crocker
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Ted Hardie
Re: take the train in Chicago, sml
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Melinda Shore
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Joel Jaeggli
Re: take the train in Chicago, Janet P Gunn
Re: take the train in Chicago, Brian E Carpenter
Re: take the train in Chicago, Tim Chown
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Dave Cridland
Re: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-answermode (Requesting Answering Modes for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, Dean Willis
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Melinda Shore
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Melinda Shore
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, michael.dillon
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Brian E Carpenter
IPv6 demystified, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino

Jul 15 2007

Audio Streaming - IETF69 Chicago Illinois USA July 22nd-27th, Joel Jaeggli
Re: take the train in Chicago, Marshall Eubanks
Re: take the train in Chicago, John Levine
take the train in Chicago, Andy Bierman

Jul 14 2007

Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Douglas Otis
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Joel Jaeggli
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Noel Chiappa
Re: Audio streaming at IETF 69, Joel Jaeggli
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Stephen Sprunk
Re: Updating the rules?, Russ Housley
Re: Updating the rules?, Russ Housley
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hannes Tschofenig
Audio streaming at IETF 69, Julian Reschke
Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Tony Hain
Re: Updating the rules?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Jul 13 2007

Re: Autoreply, Douglas Otis
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Melinda Shore
RE: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, michael.dillon
Re: Updating the rules?, Keith Moore
Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Keith Moore
The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Keith Moore
Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Keith Moore
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Updating the rules?, Julian Reschke
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Keith Moore
Re: Updating the rules?, Russ Housley
RE: Updating the rules?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Stephen Sprunk
Re: Updating the rules?, Julian Reschke
Re: Updating the rules?, Russ Housley
Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, shogunx
RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Autoreply, Ken Raeburn
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Stephen Sprunk
Re: Autoreply, Keith Moore
Re: Autoreply, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Autoreply, Keith Moore
Re: Autoreply, John C Klensin
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Re: Autoreply, Ken Raeburn
Re: Autoreply, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Autoreply, Ken Raeburn
Re: Autoreply, Douglas Otis

Jul 12 2007

Working Group Last Call: syslog-sign-22, David Harrington
Re: Autoreply: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Ken Raeburn
Re: Autoreply: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Autoreply: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-reconnect-client (IMAP4 Extensions for Quick Mailbox Resynchronization) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
RE: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Jul 11 2007

Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Ned Freed
Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Suresh Krishnan
Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, John C Klensin
IAOC Scribes, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Douglas Otis
[Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-answermode (Requesting AnsweringModes for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, Steve Langstaff
Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Eric Burger
Re: Last Call: draft-carlberg-trip-attribute-rp (TRIP Attribute for Resource Priority) to Proposed Standard, ken carlberg
Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, John C Klensin
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Masataka Ohta
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Eliot Lear
Re: PKI is weakly secure, Masataka Ohta

Jul 10 2007

Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Douglas Otis
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-answermode (Requesting Answering Modes for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Stephen Kent
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Douglas Otis
RE: Updating the rules?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re:Domain Centric Administration), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Arnt Gulbrandsen
Re: Last Call: draft-carlberg-trip-attribute-rp (TRIP Attribute for Resource Priority) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie
RE: PKI is weakly secure, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Annoying auto-reply messages, Ole Jacobsen
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-hunt-avt-rtcpxnq (BT's eXtended Network Quality RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR XNQ)) to Informational RFC, jburguet
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-carlberg-trip-attribute-rp (TRIP Attribute for Resource Priority) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
Re: PKI is weakly secure, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: PKI is weakly secure, Stephen Kent
Re: Updating the rules?, Robert Sayre
Re: PKI is weakly secure, Masataka Ohta

Jul 09 2007

Re: Updating the rules?, Peter Saint-Andre
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Stephen Kent
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Douglas Otis
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-rosenberg-sip-app-media-tag (A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Media Feature Tag for MIME Application Sub-Types) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-drage-sipping-service-identification (A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for the Identification of Services) to Informational RFC, jburguet
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Michael Tuexen
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Douglas Otis
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Lars Eggert
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Eliot Lear
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Masataka Ohta
Re: PKI is weakly secure, Sam Hartman

Jul 08 2007

Re: Updating the rules?, Sam Hartman
IETF Secretariat Services RFP Qs & As, Ray Pelletier
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Stephen Sprunk
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Mark Andrews

Jul 07 2007

Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Updating the rules?, Michael Thomas
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Keith Moore
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Masataka Ohta
Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Eliot Lear
PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Masataka Ohta
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Updating the rules?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Updating the rules?, Keith Moore
Re: Last Call: draft-wilde-text-fragment (URI Fragment Identifiers for the text/plain Media Type) to Proposed Standard, Martin Duerst
Re: Updating the rules?, Robert Sayre
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis

Jul 06 2007

Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Nicolas Williams
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, John C Klensin
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis
Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: Updating the rules?, Douglas Otis
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Kurt Zeilenga
A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Terry Gray
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Jeffrey Altman
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Sam Hartman
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Simon Josefsson
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Jeffrey Altman
Draft ION about our rules in practice, Brian E Carpenter
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-acr-code (Rejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, jburguet

Jul 05 2007

Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Alexey Melnikov
Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, john . loughney
Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
RE: Putting technology on the table [Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Sam Hartman
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics, Dave Crocker
Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Tom.Petch
Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Cullen Jennings
Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum
[no subject], ietf-bounces
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Suresh Krishnan
RE: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Black_David
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Marc Blanchet
Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Gonzalo Camarillo
Consideration of draft-lior-radius-attribute-type-extension-02.txt, Bernard Aboba
Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Tony Li
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Tony Li
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Tony Li
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Tony Li
Updating the rules?, Brian E Carpenter
Putting technology on the table [Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt], Brian E Carpenter
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Jul 04 2007

Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines (IPFIX Implementation Guidelines) to Informational RFC, jburguet
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Ole Jacobsen
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, John C Klensin
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Lakshminath Dondeti
Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Suresh Krishnan
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, michael.dillon
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Joe Baptista
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, John C Klensin
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Joe Baptista
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, michael.dillon
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, SM
RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Michel Py
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Stephen Sprunk

Jul 03 2007

Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis
RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Mailman request spam exploit, Douglas Otis
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Clint Chaplin
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
RE: Domain Centric Administration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Christian Huitema
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Douglas Otis
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Clint Chaplin
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Dave Crocker
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Joel Jaeggli
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Noel Chiappa
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Marshall Eubanks
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Joel Jaeggli
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Noel Chiappa
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Arnt Gulbrandsen
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux (Multiplexing RTP Data and Control Packets on a Single Port) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Melinda Shore
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, michael.dillon
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Thierry Ernst
Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, SM
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Mark Andrews
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, David Conrad
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Ned Freed
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Mark Andrews
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, David Morris

Jul 02 2007

RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Mark Andrews
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: Should not URIs be resources and not actions, Masataka Ohta
RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Should not URIs be resources and not actions, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore
Re: Should not URIs be resources and not actions, Eric Burger
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Douglas Otis
RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Noel Chiappa
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jeroen Massar
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, John C Klensin
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Elwyn Davies
RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Melinda Shore
RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Christian Huitema
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Melinda Shore
RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-gruu (Obtaining and Using Globally Routable User Agent (UA) URIs (GRUU) in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, jburguet
Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Noel Chiappa
secdir review of draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-04.txt, Stephen Hanna
Re: IPv6 transition technologies, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: IPv6 transition technologies, Brian E Carpenter
draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: IPv6 transition technologies, Paul Hoffman
Re: IPv6 transition technologies, John C Klensin
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino

Jul 01 2007

Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Philip Matthews
Re: IPv6 transition technologies, Paul Hoffman
IPv6 transition technologies, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
バター犬, information
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jeroen Massar
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Paul Hoffman
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore
RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Michel Py
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Fred Baker
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Noel Chiappa
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Bob Hinden

Jun 30 2007

What about the SMS URI?, Daniel Aleksandersen
Should not URIs be resources and not actions, Daniel Aleksandersen

Jun 29 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC, Douglas Otis
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-srp (Using SRP for TLS Authentication) to Informational RFC, jburguet
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC, Douglas Otis

Jun 28 2007

Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Ralph Droms
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Michael Thomas
Re: IESG workload problem (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? ), Joe Touch
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter
IESG workload problem (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? ), Harald Alvestrand

Jun 27 2007

Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Michael Thomas
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Keith Moore
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Keith Moore
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter

Jun 26 2007

Has anyone looked at the DISCUSS Criteria document lately? (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)), Spencer Dawkins

Jun 25 2007

Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Randall Gellens

Jun 24 2007

Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jim Martin
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch
RE: Ietf Digest, Vol 38, Issue 40... Content of IETF digest., Mohammed Shahnawaz

Jun 22 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Chris Newman

Jun 22 2007

Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin
Udaya V Kumar is out of the office., Udaya V Kumar
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC, jburguet
Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten

Jun 21 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Dave Crocker
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin

Jun 20 2007

Raimond, Raimond ZWEDUKS
Anina, Anina GONNIRICH
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John C Klensin

Jun 19 2007

Re: ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78), Brian E Carpenter
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch
ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78), Dave Cridland
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-split, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Clint Chaplin
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Cullen Jennings
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Joel M. Halpern

Jun 18 2007

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Joel M. Halpern
Re: On Experts [Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)], Michael Thomas
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Henning Schulzrinne
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba
RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba
RE: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Black_David
Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Gonzalo Camarillo
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joel M. Halpern

Mail converted by MHonArc