IETF Discussion Archive - Date Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]
- Sep 27 2006
- Sep 26 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Frank Ellermann
- IDN effort has ballooned in scope without involving relevant additional review, Sam Hartman
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Fred Baker
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Frank Ellermann
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Andrew G. Malis
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, stephen wolff
- RE: 25th Anniversary!, Bob Braden
- RE: 25th Anniversary!, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Dave Crocker
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Bob Braden
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Noel Chiappa
- RE: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 anddraft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Harald Alvestrand
- 25th Anniversary!, rpelletier
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, John C Klensin
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Siemens to Host IETF 67, Fred Baker
- Siemens to Host IETF 67, rpelletier
- Sep 25 2006
- Sep 24 2006
- Sep 23 2006
- Sep 22 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Sam Hartman
- Re: Looking forward not back, John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), David Kessens
- Looking forward not back, Sam Hartman
- Re: RFC/Protocol Quantification, Frank Ellermann
- RFC/Protocol Quantification, Sreevathsa
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Jefsey_Morfin
- RFC/Protocol Quantification, Sreevathsa
- Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Theodore Tso
- Sep 21 2006
- Re: Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Jefsey_Morfin
- Re: Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Fred Baker
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Sam Hartman
- Re: IANA XML registries, Jefsey_Morfin
- Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, JFC Morfin
- Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving ..., Scott Bradner
- Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], John C Klensin
- Re: IANA XML registries, Peter Dambier
- BCCed messages, was Re: IANA XML registries, Tony Finch
- IANA XML registries, JFC Morfin
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Sam Hartman
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Sam Hartman
- Sep 20 2006
- Re: The BOF wiki, Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Bernard Desruisseaux
- Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, JFC Morfin
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Scott Bradner
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Jefsey_Morfin
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Dave Cridland
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Dave Crocker
- Sep 19 2006
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Russ Allbery
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Sam Hartman
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Sam Hartman
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Dave Cridland
- RE: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Gray, Eric
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Jeffrey Altman
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Harald Alvestrand
- RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Gray, Eric
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Dave Crocker
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Robert Sayre
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving, Jefsey_Morfin
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Tony Finch
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke
- security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Robert Sayre
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Russ Allbery
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Robert Sayre
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], grenville armitage
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving, Frank Ellermann
- RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Theodore Tso
- Sep 18 2006
- Re: Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Bill Fenner
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Jefsey_Morfin
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
- Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Randy Presuhn
- Sep 17 2006
- Sep 16 2006
- Sep 15 2006
- Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an openElection Process, todd glassey
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Processratherthansome, todd glassey
- Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, todd glassey
- Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Andy Bierman
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, todd glassey
- Flaw in the design of NoteWell makes Notewell Not Well., todd glassey
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, todd glassey
- Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Jefsey_Morfin
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Nelson, David
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Noel Chiappa
- Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stewart Bryant
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Eliot Lear
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Yaakov Stein
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Dave Cridland
- Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Noel Chiappa
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Sep 14 2006
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather thansome, Randy Presuhn
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, bmanning
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, bmanning
- Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthan some, todd glassey
- Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stewart Bryant
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
- Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Tim Chown
- Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Theodore Tso
- Sep 13 2006
- Sep 12 2006
- RE: what happened to newtrk?, Jeffrey Hutzelman
- RE: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin
- help, Sheikh, Usman Fakhar \(UMKC-Student\)
- Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Steven M. Bellovin
- RE: what happened to newtrk?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Fred Baker
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Eliot Lear
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin
- Re: Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames), Ted Faber
- Re: Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames), todd glassey
- RE: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- IPv6 communication, thekkayil.joy
- Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames), Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Theodore Tso
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Jefsey_Morfin
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Carl Malamud
- Sep 11 2006
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Carl Malamud
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Jefsey_Morfin
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Sam Hartman
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, todd glassey
- Re: Constant flux (was: Why cant the IETF embrace an open ElectionProcess [...]), todd glassey
- Ietf mailing list probe message, ietf-bounces+ae1be1fd4fd2620e99ad7ebb1e93adbf0264acf3
- Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Pekka Savola
- Constant flux (was: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process [...]), Frank Ellermann
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Rob Evans
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Noel Chiappa
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
- Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Theodore Tso
- appeals, JFC Morfin
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Randy Presuhn
- Sep 10 2006
- Sep 09 2006
- Sep 08 2006
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Ned Freed
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Christian Huitema
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Ned Freed
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Christian Huitema
- Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Christian Huitema
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Sam Hartman
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Sep 07 2006
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: RFC 2195, Frank Ellermann
- Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), John C Klensin
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Frank Ellermann
- RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Responses, Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, bmanning
- Re: [mpls] Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2), George Swallow
- Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2), Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Responses, Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test), Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Pekka Savola
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Pekka Savola
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Stewart Bryant
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Eliot Lear
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Ralph Droms
- Sep 06 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Jeffrey Hutzelman
- RFC Editor RFP Responses, rpelletier
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Ned Freed
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Keith Moore
- Re: Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Keith Moore
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
- Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer, Ted Hardie
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Eliot Lear
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Ned Freed
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Lars Eggert
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Keith Moore
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Frank Ellermann
- RFC 2195 (was Re: what happened to newtrk?), Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Eliot Lear
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin
- RE: what happened to newtrk?, Pasi.Eronen
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Edward Lewis
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Lars Eggert
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Brian E Carpenter
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Stewart Bryant
- Decision to Reset the NomCom Process, Andrew Lange
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Randy Presuhn
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, C. M. Heard
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here..., Richard Shockey
- Sep 05 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Frank Ellermann
- Re: feed-license-08, James M Snell
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Theodore Tso
- feed-license-08 (was: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)), Frank Ellermann
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to belackofcommunicaiton here..., Al Arsenault
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Sandy Wills
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Jari Arkko
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Jari Arkko
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., todd glassey
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, John C Klensin
- Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Keith Moore
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Keith Moore
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Keith Moore
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communication here..., todd glassey
- Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communication here..., Fleischman, Eric
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., todd glassey
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Stewart Bryant
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Stewart Bryant
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Keith Moore
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, todd glassey
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Keith Moore
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., todd glassey
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Noel Chiappa
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here..., Noel Chiappa
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Michael Thomas
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here..., Noel Chiappa
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, todd glassey
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here..., todd glassey
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- what happened to newtrk?, Eliot Lear
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Eliot Lear
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., John C Klensin
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Andrew Newton
- Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
- Re: Size of pool (Was: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...), bmanning
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Sam Hartman
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Bill Fenner
- Sep 04 2006
- Sep 02 2006
- Sep 02 2006
- Sep 01 2006
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Jeffrey Hutzelman
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Ned Freed
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), todd glassey
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Sam Hartman
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Pekka Savola
- IETF Meetings 68 & 69, rpelletier
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Thomas Narten
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., John C Klensin
- Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?, Tim Chown
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Frank Ellermann
- RE: Fixing the algorithm, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Fixing the algorithm, todd glassey
- [no subject], Jari Arkko
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Marshall Eubanks
- Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?, Jeroen Massar
- Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?, Tim Chown
- Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt), Jefsey_Morfin
- RE: Fixing the algorithm, Yaakov Stein
- Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?, Jeroen Massar
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke
- www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?, Tim Chown
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Yaakov Stein
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset, Harald Alvestrand
- Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org, Thomas Narten
- Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset, Marshall Eubanks
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Richard Shockey
- Size of pool (Was: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...), Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Scott Bradner
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Dave Crocker
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Scott Bradner
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Richard Shockey
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Joel M. Halpern
- Fixing the algorithm, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Theodore Tso
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Jefsey_Morfin
- Aug 31 2006
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Pete Resnick
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., John C Klensin
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eliot Lear
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Michael StJohns
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Michael StJohns
- Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset, John Leslie
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Cimbala, Matthew
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Randy Presuhn
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eliot Lear
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., James Galvin
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Dave Crocker
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Stewart Bryant
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., James Galvin
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Dave Crocker
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., James Galvin
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Richard Shockey
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Dave Crocker
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Leslie Daigle
- Re: Last call comment on 'XML Pipelining with Chunks for the, Andrew Newton
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Jeffrey Hutzelman
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., todd glassey
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Michael StJohns
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Ted Hardie
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Ned Freed
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Cyrus Daboo
- Last call comment on 'XML Pipelining with Chunks for the, Rick Jelliffe
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Richard Shockey
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\)
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Eliot Lear
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
- [no subject], Unknown
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Michael StJohns
- [no subject], Unknown
- Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Michael StJohns
- What is going on with the NOMCOM, Richard Shockey
- Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Richard Shockey
- Resend: RE: What is going on with the NOMCOM, Richard Shockey
- Aug 30 2006
- Aug 29 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Lisa Dusseault
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Bernard Desruisseaux
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Julian Reschke
- Re: Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Robert Sayre
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav), Bernard Desruisseaux
- Re: Measurements at IETF65., Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Measurements at IETF65., Andrea G Forte
- I'm looking for Pacific Islanders on the IETF, Franck Martin
- Aug 28 2006
- Aug 27 2006
- Aug 26 2006
- Aug 25 2006
- Aug 23 2006
- Aug 22 2006
- Aug 18 2006
Mail converted by MHonArc
